Clinical Study of Stent Versus Direct Atherectomy Versus Angioplasty to Treat Lower Limb In-stent Restenosis
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Atherosclerosis
- Sponsor
- Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
- Enrollment
- 120
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Primary Patency Rate
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This is a randomized study comparing Stent Versus Direct Atherectomy Versus Angioplasty to Treat Lower Limb In-stent Restenosis (superficial femoral or popliteal artery).
Detailed Description
This is a randomized study comparing Stent Versus Direct Atherectomy Versus Angioplasty to Treat Lower Limb In-stent Restenosis (superficial femoral or popliteal artery).
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Provides written informed consent Willing to comply with follow-up evaluations at specified times Has claudication or rest pain due to peripheral arterial In-stent restenosis Disease located within the femoropopliteal artery Patient has a In-stent restenosis lesion(s) with \>50% stenosis documented angiographically Patient has symptoms of peripheral arterial disease classified as Rutherford Category 2 or greater.
Exclusion Criteria
- •They were excluded if they had one or more of the following:
- •Acute or subacute lower limb ischemia;
- •Severe calcification lesions;
- •Total occlusions lesions more significant than 10 cm or total occlusion lesions with a suspicion of subintimal wire recanalization
- •untreated ipsilateral iliac artery stenosis\>70%, or the distal runoff artery \<1 root;
- •Previously lower extremity intervention or surgical graft artery bypass;
- •Severe renal insufficiency, creatinine level greater than 2.5 mg/dL;
- •The patient's platelet count is less than 100,000/uL, antiplatelet or anticoagulant contraindications to required medications;
- •Patients with immune system diseases or malignant tumours;
- •ongoing active infection
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Primary Patency Rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Primary patency is defined as no significant reduction of flow detectable by Duplex ultrasound through the index lesion and no further clinically driven target vessel revascularization performed in the interim. Significant reduction of flow is binary restenosis defined as the diameter stenosis \>50% with a peak systolic velocity ratio \>2.4 as measured by Duplex ultrasound.
Secondary Outcomes
- Technical success(1 day)
- Major Adverse Events(12 months)
- freedom from clinically-driven TLR(12 months)
- Limb Salvage Rate(12 months)