The feasibility and efficacy of intensive home treatment (IHT) as an alternative to acute psychiatric admission.
- Conditions
- mental illnesspsychological disorder10039628
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON46022
- Lead Sponsor
- Arkin (Amsterdam)
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 230
1) A psychiatrist must state that admission to a clinical crisis care department is indicated, if necessary on a compulsory basis. This decision is based on clinical outcomes, opinions of other professionals and informal caregivers.
(2) There is at least one axis I or II disorder diagnosed (for example psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder or a personality disorder).
(3) The patient is a resident of Amsterdam, Diemen or Driemond, the Netherlands.
(4) Written informed consent provided by patient.
(1) Patient is homeless.
(2) Primary diagnosis is substance use disorder for which referral to a specialized unit for detoxification is indicated.
(3) Currently receiving (F)ACT care.
(4) Previous IHT-treatment.
(5) Patient age < 18 or > 65.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The number of hospitalisation days in the 12 months after randomisation. This<br /><br>includes the duration of the initial admission at baseline, and any subsequent<br /><br>psychiatric admission during the follow-up period of the study. </p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Secondary outcomes include safety of the patient and his/her direct social<br /><br>environment, mental wellbeing, general functioning, and quality of life. In<br /><br>addition to reporting clinical outcomes and hospitalisation duration, an<br /><br>economic evaluation alongside the RCT is planned.</p><br>