MedPath

MGuard Stent in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
Thrombus
Stents
Interventions
Device: Bare-metal stent and manual thrombectomy device
Device: MGuard net protective coronary stent
Registration Number
NCT01124942
Lead Sponsor
Federico II University
Brief Summary

The Investigators will test the hypothesis that MGuard net protective stent, the investigational device, would be superior to conventional revascularization strategy (i.e. bare-metal stenting plus manual thrombectomy), for STEMI patients undergoing urgent percutaneous coronary interventions.

Detailed Description

Embolization of thrombotic debris still represents a complication for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

Distal embolization may decrease coronary and myocardial reperfusion after PCI in STEMI setting.

Unfortunately, intracoronary filters present several important limitations limiting their use and their efficacy especially in presence of huge amount of thrombus. In this respect, recent trials investigated whether a default manual thrombectomy strategy before stenting would ameliorate angiographic as well as clinical outcomes for STEMI patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization.

Of note, the most of embolization occurs when guidewire, and thrombectomy device cross the thrombus, and after the stent has been implanted as a consequence of plaque prolapse through the stent struts.

MGuard net protective stent, the investigational device, is a bare-metal stent covered with a ultra-thin flexible polyethylene terephthalate (or Dacron) mesh sleeve, that is anchored to the external surface of the struts. This biocompatible fiber net (string diameter 10-22 μm) has minimal effects on the stents' trackability and deliverability. During stent deployment, the net stretches and slides over the expanding stent struts, trapping the thromboembolic debris underneath the fiber net and isolating the prothrombotic intima components from the blood stream.

This protocol will test the hypothesis that MGuard stent would be superior to conventional revascularization strategy (i.e. bare-metal stenting plus manual thrombectomy), for STEMI patients undergoing urgent PCI in terms of angiographic as well as clinical outcomes.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
350
Inclusion Criteria
  • >/= 18-year-old patients, willing to participate the study, after informed consent signature
  • Female not pregnant or potentially child-bearing
  • > 1 mV ST segment elevation in two or more contiguous leads
  • Acute MI lasting more than 30 minutes and less than 12 hours
  • De novo acute MI
  • Infarct related artery reference vessel diameter >/= 2.5 mm
  • Patient suitable for stenting according to vessel and lesion features
Exclusion Criteria
  • Dual antiplatelet therapy contraindication
  • Ischemic stroke less than 30 days or previous haemorrhagic stroke
  • WBC count less than 1000 per mm3;
  • Platelet count less than 50.000 per mm3
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year
  • Cardiogenic shock at admission
  • Previous stented infarct related artery
  • Stent thrombosis as the responsible for current STEMI
  • Inability to identify infarct related artery
  • True bifurcation lesion, or lesion near a side branch with a reference vessel diameter >/= 2.5 mm that could be diseased after stenting procedure
  • LBBB
  • Definitive pacing (or ECG abnormalities precluding ST-segment resolution evaluation
  • Participation other study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
BMS plus thrombectomyBare-metal stent and manual thrombectomy deviceBare-metal stent plus manual thrombectomy device
MGuardMGuard net protective coronary stentMGuard net protective stent, investigational device
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of patients with Myocardial Perfusional Blush Grade 2-330 minutes after revascularization

Myocardial Perfusional Blush Grade 2-3 at the end of the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of MACE12 months

Number of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events experienced among study population, including: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel failure.

Complete ST-segment resolution60 minutes after revascularization

Complete (\>70%) ST-segment resolution at 60 minutes post-revascularization

Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction antegrade coronary flow30 minutes after revascularization

TIMI coronary flow at the end of the procedure

Corrected TIMI Frame count30 minutes after revascularization

Corrected TIMI Frame count at the end of the procedure

Infarct related area reduction and left ventricular ejection fraction recovery6 months

Six-month infarct related area reduction and left ventricular ejection fraction recovery as compared with infarct related area and and left ventricular ejection fraction at admission.

Procedural device performance60 minutes after revascularizationl

Device performance evaluated during the procedure in terms of pushability, trackability, crossability and deliverability

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Federico II University of Naples

🇮🇹

Naples, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath