A Study comparing two Airway device LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme in laproscopic cholecystectomy
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- ASA1 and ASA2
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/03/012665
- Lead Sponsor
- Mridula pawar head of department
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
Normal Airway
ASA1 and ASA2
Weight 30-70 kg
Exclusion Criteria
Difficult Airway, mouth opening <2.5 cm, history of Upper respiratory tract infection in previous 10 days, Obesity, intestinal pathology, esophageal pathology, cervical spine pathology, pregnancy,edentulous
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Placement of both device is easy and simple. LMA proseal provides better seal pressure.both devices provide similar fiber-optic bronchoscopic view. Intracuff pressure of LMA Proseal was higher than LMA supreme. More frequent deflation of air should be done for LMA Proseal.Timepoint: 04/03/2014
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Both devices have minimal intraoperative and postoperative complicationsTimepoint: Intraoperative and postoperative