跳至主要内容
临床试验/JPRN-UMIN000025759
JPRN-UMIN000025759已完成未知

A systematic review on the improvement of skin moisture retention by the functional participating component "glucosylceramide" - A systematic review on the improvement of skin moisture retention by the functional participating component "glucosylceramide"

Adaptgen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.0 个研究点目标入组 1 人开始时间: 2017年1月20日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
已完成
入组人数
1

研究概览

简要总结

Relationship between the results of research review and the functionality to be displayed As a result of the SR study, the outcome with respect to the RQ / QC set for the functionality (effectiveness) given to a person by the functional participating component glucosylceramide is to consume glucosylceramide continuously from 0.6 mg to 4.0 mg per day By improving the barrier function of the skin and water retention ability and improving the moisturizing function "as confirmed by this SR research, the ancestor and divergence between the display contents and the literature It can be denied. Also regarding safety, there were no adverse events that glucosylceramide is considered to be a direct cause, and certain safety was also confirmed.

研究设计

研究类型
Others,meta-analysis etc

入排标准

年龄范围
20years-old 至 ot applicable(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • [Exclusion Criteria] In the secondary screening, provisional candidate documents are obtained by the abstract, and those corresponding to one or more of the following exclusion criteria are excluded from the candidate literature. 1. Clinical research literature for subjects suffering from skin diseases 2. Literature of clinical research for minors 3. Clinical research literature for pregnant women and lactating women 4. Clinical research literature not reviewed 5. Literature of clinical study without comparative control group 6. Literature of clinical study in which the main involved component is not glucosylceramide 7. Clinical research literature which can not be evaluated by glucosylceramide and other equivalent ingredients 8. In addition, clinical research literature judged inappropriate by the reviewer's agreement

研究者

相似试验