Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00988871
NCT00988871
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of the Central Venous Pressures Measured From the Peripherally Inserted Antecubital Central Catheters and the Internal Jugular Vein Central Catheters in Liver Transplantation Recipients

National Cancer Center, Korea1 site in 1 country35 target enrollmentAugust 2008

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Patients Cannulated With Both PICC and CICC.
Sponsor
National Cancer Center, Korea
Enrollment
35
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
PICCP: CVP measured from peripherally inserted antecubital central catheters in liver transplantation recipients
Status
Completed
Last Updated
16 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Background: Central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring from the peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) has not often been used because of the higher inherent resistance of the PICC due to its longer length and narrower lumen. The objective of this study was to assess the reliability of the CVP measured from PICCs as a predictor of the CVP measured from CICCs in the setting of rapidly fluctuating hemodynamic conditions during liver transplantation.

Detailed Description

According to the protocol of LT in our hospital, a PICC is concomitantly inserted with the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and 9-Fr advanced venous access (AVA) catheter for the LT recipient at anesthetic induction. PAC and AVA catheter are usually removed on the second postoperative day, and instead the PICC is used for the postoperative infusion of prostaglandin E1 which is very irritable to small peripheral vein. So we fortunately had chance to measure the CVPs from both CICC and PICC simultaneously in the same patients. Methods: We measured the CVPs from the CICC and the PICC simultaneously during each main surgical period of adult liver transplantation (preanhepatic, anhepatic, reperfusion, and neo-hepatic period). Data are presented as means ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using simple linear regression analysis to observe whether changes in the PICCP were paralleled by simultaneous changes in the CICCP. Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine the degree of agreement between the two devices. Analysis of variance was performed to study whether there were changes in the CVP agreement profiles in regard to the different time periods of LT. Differences were regarded as being statistically significant when p values were less than 0.05. (This observational study has been completed already.)

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 2008
End Date
June 2009
Last Updated
16 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients who had been scheduled for elective liver transplant surgery
  • Patients who had been placed with both PICC and CICC at anesthetic induction

Exclusion Criteria

  • Failure to insert PICC

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

PICCP: CVP measured from peripherally inserted antecubital central catheters in liver transplantation recipients

Time Frame: every 10 minutes during the liver transplantation

CICCP: CVP from IJV central catheters in liver transplantation recipients

Time Frame: every 10 minutes during the liver transplantation

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials