Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Repeat Hepatectomy for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Hepatocellular Carcinoma

• Registration Number: NCT01570166
• Lead Sponsor: Sun Yat-sen University

Brief Summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in the world. Partial hepatectomy is still considered as the conventional therapy for HCC. Intrahepatic recurrence of HCC after partial hepatectomy is common and was reported to be more than 77% within 5 years after surgery. Repeat hepatectomy is an effective treatment for intrahepatic HCC recurrence, with a 5-year survival rate of 19.4-56%. This is comparable to the survival after initial hepatectomy for HCC. Unfortunately, repeat hepatectomy could be carried out only in a small proportion of patients with HCC recurrence (10.4-31%), either because of the poor functional liver reserve or because of widespread intrahepatic recurrence. In the past two decades, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) has emerged as a new treatment modality and has attracted great interest because of its effectiveness and safety for small HCC (≤ 5.0 cm). Studies using PRFA to treat recurrent HCC after partial hepatectomy reported a 3-year survival rate of 62-68%, which is comparable to those achieved by surgery. PRFA is particularly suitable to treat recurrent HCC after partial hepatectomy because these tumors are usually detected when they are small and PRFA causes the least deterioration of liver function in the patients. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no report published in the medical literature comparing the efficacy of repeat hepatectomy with PRFA for recurrent HCC. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the outcome of repeat hepatectomy with PRFA for small recurrent HCC after partial hepatectomy.

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in the world. Partial hepatectomy is still considered as the conventional therapy for HCC. Intrahepatic recurrence of HCC after partial hepatectomy is common and was reported to be more than 77% within 5 years after surgery. Repeat hepatectomy is an effective treatment for intrahepaticHCC recurrence, with a 5-year survival rate of 19.4-56%. This is comparable to the survival after initial hepatectomy for HCC. Unfortunately, repeat hepatectomy could be carried out only in a small proportion of patients with HCC recurrence (10.4-31%), either because of the poor functional liver reserve or because of widespread intrahepatic recurrence. In the past two decades, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) has emerged as a new treatment modality and has attracted great interest because of its effectiveness and safety for small HCC (≤ 5.0 cm). Studies using PRFA to treat recurrent HCC after partial hepatectomy reported a 3-year survival rate of 62-68%, which is comparable to those achieved by surgery. PRFA is particularly suitable to treat recurrent HCC after partial hepatectomy because these tumors are usually detected when they are small and PRFA causes the least deterioration of liver function in the patients. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no report published in the medical literature comparing the efficacy of repeat hepatectomy with PRFA for recurrent HCC. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the outcome of repeat hepatectomy with PRFA for small recurrent HCC after partial hepatectomy.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2011-11-01
• Study First Submitted: 2012-03-28
• Study First Submitted QC: 2012-04-03
• Study First Posted: 2012-04-04
• Primary Completion: 2019-03-01
• Status Verified: 2019-06
• Last Update Submitted: 2019-06-24
• Last Update Posted: 2019-06-26
• Study Completion: 2023-03-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 210

Inclusion Criteria

1. age 18 - 75 years;
2. Distant recurrence of HCC after initial curative treatment (including initial RFA or hepatectomy);
3. no other treatment received except for the initial RFA or hepatectomy;
4. Single tumor less than 4cm in diameter;
5. lesions visible on ultrasound and with an acceptable and safe path between the lesion and the skin as shown on ultrasound;
6. no severe coagulation disorders (prothrombin activity < 40% or a platelet count of < 40,000 / mm3;
7. Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group performance(ECOG) status 0 -

Exclusion Criteria

1. the presence of vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread on imaging;
2. a Child-Pugh class C liver cirrhosis or evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, severe coagulation disorders (prothrombin activity < 40% or a platelet count of < 40,000 / mm3), esophageal or gastric variceal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy;
3. an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: FACTORIAL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
overall survival	5-year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
disease-free survival	5-year

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Cancer Center, Sun Yat-set University; 🇨🇳 Guangzhou, Guangdong, China