跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01099826
NCT01099826已完成不适用

Increasing CRC Screening in Primary Care Settings

Arizona State University0 个研究点目标入组 511 人开始时间: 2004年10月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
511
主要终点
completing CRC screening test

研究概览

简要总结

Colorectal cancer screening remains lower than optimal. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of phone-based motivational interviewing versus tailored communication versus usual care in increasing CRC screening in primary care clinics.

详细描述

Regular screening reduces both morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). Screening rates, however, remain low suggesting the need for innovative research designed to increase screening behavior. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two interventions (Tailored Health Communication [THC] and Motivational Interviewing [MI]) in increasing CRC screening behavior. Both interventions are based on a strong conceptual framework derived from the Health Belief Model (HBM) and Transtheoretical Model (TTM), allowing us to explore the underlying mechanisms through which these interventions impact behavior change.

The primary aim of this study is to compare CRC screening test use among 804 participants randomly allocated to control or intervention conditions; participants will be recruited from the two sites (Chicago, IL, and Nashville, TN). The 3 study groups will receive (1) standard care, (2) tailored health communication, and (3) motivational interviewing. Eligibility criteria for study participants includes being 50 years or older, not having CRC, and being of average or moderate risk for CRC. Study participants will be surveyed by telephone about CRC-related beliefs pre-intervention (Time 1), 1 month postintervention (Time 2), and at 6 months postintervention (Times 3 and 4, respectively). Dichotomous behavioral outcomes (had screening test or not) and stages of CRC screening test adoption (based on the TTM) will be assessed, as well as sociodemographic and belief predictors of screening behavior. Binomial and multinomial logistic regression models will be used to evaluate screening test use and stage of test adoption. Sociodemographic and belief variables will be used as covariates, with intervention group as the primary independent predictor. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA will be employed to assess between intervention differences in amenable beliefs. Path (mediation) analysis will be performed to further explore the underlying mechanisms through which THC and MI may differentially affect CRC screening behavior.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Screening
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • all genders
  • can speak, read, write English
  • no diagnosis of colorectal cancer
  • non-adherent with screening
  • age 50 or older

排除标准

  • had colorectal cancer
  • adherent with screening

结局指标

主要结局

completing CRC screening test

时间窗: 1 and 6 months post education

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Usha Menon

Faculty

Arizona State University

相似试验