Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02940717
NCT02940717
Unknown
Not Applicable

Clinical Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance for E-max Cad and Vita Suprinity Laminate Veneers

Cairo University0 sites16 target enrollmentJanuary 2017

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Tooth Discoloration
Sponsor
Cairo University
Enrollment
16
Primary Endpoint
Fracture resistance assessed by clinical evaluation using dental mirror and probe according to the modified united states public health criteria
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Patients need laminate veneer for their teeth usually use Emax CAD as an etchable ceramic. Yet fracture may occur so a stronger material is needed. Vita Suprinity is a recent material with glass ceramic enriched with zirconia (approx. 10% by weight) that offer practices and laboratories a high-strength, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLS) and can be used to fabricate laminate veneers but the investigators have to know clinically it is fracture resistance, so the investigators are going to have Parallel groups in a randomized clinical trial.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 2017
End Date
March 2018
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ahmed mohamed osman Youssef

Internal resident at fixed prothodontics department faculty of oral and dental medicine cairo university

Cairo University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • All subjects are required to be:
  • From 18-60 years old, and able to read and sign the informed consent document.
  • Physically and psychologically able to tolerate conventional restorative procedures
  • Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations
  • Patients with teeth problems indicated for laminate veneer (e.g. discoloration, fracture not involve more than 50% enamel loss, mild malposition, ....)
  • Willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth
  • Patient with fractured teeth of more than 50% enamel loss
  • Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation
  • Pregnant women
  • Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
  • Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Fracture resistance assessed by clinical evaluation using dental mirror and probe according to the modified united states public health criteria

Time Frame: 1 Year

clinical evaluation of Fracture resistance

Secondary Outcomes

  • Patient satisfaction assessed using a Questionnaire(1 Year)

Similar Trials