A prospective randomized study to compare vLarynx video laryngoscope and King Vision video laryngoscope in adult patients undergoing surgery
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare the laryngoscopy and intubation time using the two devices.
研究概览
简要总结
Abstract
A prospective randomized study to compare vLarynx video laryngoscope and King Vision video laryngoscope in adult patients undergoing surgery
Sakeena Mohammadi Hashmi ***, Syed Hussain Amir **, Qazi Ehsaan Ali*
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical care, JNMCH, AMU, Aligarh
***Presenting author, **Supervisor, *Co-Supervisor
INTRODUCTION
During general anaesthesia difficulty in tracheal intubation and management of complicated airways remains one of the most important and demanding tasks. The traditional approach and agreed practice for tracheal intubation has been direct laryngoscopy using blade adjustment with Macintosh blade in adults. It requires skill and alignment of oropharyngo-laryngeal axis which is not always possible and thus poses a difficulty.
Visualization of vocal cords with instruments via an optical system or through a video systemia an alternative to direct laryngoscopy. Compared with it, video laryngoscopes have been described as being able to minimise difficulty, failure, trauma, and other complications.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficiency of vLarynx video laryngoscope with King Vision video laryngoscope as control while intubating patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The study will include 60 patients undergoing elective general surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation. Each group will include 30 patients.
Primary objective: To compare the laryngoscopy and intubation time using the two devices
Secondary objectives: To compare number of attempts for successful intubation, compare the glottic view using POGO (percentage of glottic opening) score, grade the ease of tracheal intubation using these devices, compare the hemodynamic response i.e., Heart Rate and Mean Arterial Blood Pressure after laryngoscopy and intubation and to look for post operative complications if any.
RESULTS
Above quoted parameters will be recorded for both the devices and compared in this study.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 21.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients of ASA grade I and II.
- •Weight between 41-70kg.
- •Patients planned for elective surgical procedures.
- •All grades of Mallampatti classification.
排除标准
- •1.Previous history of multiple failed intubation.
- •Head and neck surgery.
- •Valvular heart disease.
- •CAD/uncontrolled hypertension.
- •Presence of raised intracranial pressure.
- •Cervical spine injury.
- •Predicted difficult laryngoscopy.
- •Any pathology of oral cavity that will obstruct the insertion of device.
- •Mouth opening <2.5cm.
- •Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn) and at risk of esophageal reflux (hiatus hernia).
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the laryngoscopy and intubation time using the two devices.
时间窗: At baseline
次要结局
- 1. To compare number of attempts for successful intubation.(2. To compare the glottic view using POGO (percentage of glottic opening) score.)