Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04172363
NCT04172363
Withdrawn
Phase 3

Clinical Relevance of the Antimicrobial Resistance Testing in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds With Antiseptics

RWTH Aachen University1 site in 1 countryJuly 22, 2020

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Octenisept and Serasept
Conditions
Decubiti
Sponsor
RWTH Aachen University
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in bacteria rate
Status
Withdrawn
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The study objective is to improve the current and local standard antiseptic treatment by adjusting the antiseptic agent to the antimicrobial resistance testing result, accordingly. Currently, resistance testing will only be performed for the treatment with antibiotics.

Detailed Description

Complications like bacterial wound colonization and infections in wound treatment are still a serious problem. Several therapy approaches are available to treat these complications, e.g. surgical wound debridement, antimicrobial therapy that can be divided into a local and a systemic antisepsis. The local antisepsis (the local utilization of antiseptics directly to the wound) is in many ways advantageous to the systemic antisepsis (orally or intravenously administered antibiotics): e. g. the direct contact of the antiseptic to the bacteria at the site of infection whereas antibiotics may not sufficiently reach the wound due to limited blood perfusion of wounds; growing utilization of systemic antisepsis also leads to an increasing number of resistant bacteria worldwide. To the concerns of many specialists, the first pan-resistant bacterial strain which is resistant to all available antibiotics including colistin was recently published. In future, the role of local antisepsis therefore becomes more important in the antimicrobial treatment. Luckily, resistances of local antiseptics occur slowly due to the chemical and structural characteristics of antiseptics but even resistances of bacteria to antiseptics were reported. Unlike the antimicrobial resistance testing for antibiotics that is done in the clinical routine, such testing is not a standard procedure for antiseptics for no obvious reason. The utilization of antiseptics is determined by the availability of products provided within the institution and preferences of the clinician. Thus, it is unknown whether the chosen antiseptic has any bactericidal effect on the confirmed bacteria. University Hospital RWTH Aachen Wound Care only uses polyhexanide and octenisept. Iodine-containing preparations are explicitly not desired.Improvement (bacteria reduction, acceleration of wound healing) of the local antiseptic therapy by adapting the antiseptic to the results of antimicrobial resistance testing. Antimicrobial resistance testing has so far only been used to adapt systemic antibiotic therapy.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 22, 2020
End Date
May 22, 2021
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Decubitus OR secondary healing acute and chronic wounds
  • Positively tested wound swab for bacteria (incl. multi-resistant bacteria)
  • Patient is capable of understanding the nature, significance and consequence of the clinical trial
  • Given written consent
  • Women of child bearing potential (WOCBP) who apply appropriate methods of contraception throughout the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Occlusive dressing (e.g. VAC) or Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT)
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Known allergies against investigational products

Arms & Interventions

Resistance testing

Patients will be first tested on resistance to Octenisept and Serasept and will receive the appropriate antiseptic after reviewing the results

Intervention: Octenisept and Serasept

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in bacteria rate

Time Frame: up to 12 months

determination of the relative proportion of isolates to the total flora in the wound

Secondary Outcomes

  • Laboratory Parameters - Change in C-reactive protein (CRP)(up to 12 months)
  • Laboratory Parameters - Change in Leukocytes(up to 12 months)
  • Change in Bates-Jensen Score(up to 12 months)
  • Incidence of wound related adverse events(up to 12 months)
  • Change in Pressure Ulcers: Scale for Healing (PUSH) score(up to 12 months)
  • Laboratory Parameters - Change in hemoglobin(up to 12 months)
  • Laboratory Parameters - Change in hematokrit(up to 12 months)
  • Laboratory Parameters - Change in creatinine(up to 12 months)
  • Laboratory Parameters - Change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR)(up to 12 months)
  • Laboratory Parameters - Change in Uric acid(up to 12 months)
  • Laboratory Parameters - Change in glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (GPT)(up to 12 months)
  • Laboratory Parameters - Change in Glutamat-Oxalacetat- Transaminase (GOT)(up to 12 months)
  • Laboratory Parameters - Change in Glucose(up to 12 months)
  • Hospital length of stay(up to 12 months)
  • Rate of antibiotics used(up to 12 months)
  • Length of bed confinement(up to 12 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials