MedPath

The Effect of Repeated Simulation in Developing Social Justice Advocacy Attitudes and Skills on Nursing Student

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Nurse's Role
Education
Nursing
Interventions
Behavioral: experimental group
Registration Number
NCT05966181
Lead Sponsor
Ege University
Brief Summary

It is a randomized controlled experimental and single-blind study with a pretest-posttest control group design.

Detailed Description

It is a randomized controlled experimental and single-blind study with a pretest-posttest control group design, planned to examine the effect of repeated simulation (standard patient simulation) on improving nursing students' social justice advocacy attitudes and skills.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
48
Inclusion Criteria
  • Volunteering to participate in the research Being a 4th year undergraduate nursing student Having completed the theoretical education for vocational courses
Exclusion Criteria
  • Being a foreign national (due to Turkish speaking/understanding problem)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
experimental groupexperimental groupThey will perform repetitive simulation (standard patient simulation according to scenarios) with the students in the experimental group.
control groupexperimental groupA single simulation will be applied to the control group (standard patient simulation according to scenarios).
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Repeated simulationfour weeks

Repeated simulation is effective in developing nursing students' social justice advocacy attitudes and skills.

Students' social justice advocacy attitudes will be measured with the "Social Justice Advocacy Scale". The scale is a 7-point Likert-type scale. 1 means "Absolutely Not True" and 7 means "Absolutely True". The minimum score is 41 and the maximum score is 287 from the scale; it is stated that as the scores obtained from the scale increase, social justice advocacy skills also increase.

Students' advocacy skills will be measured with the "Social Justice Advocacy Skills Assessment Guide". The scoring in the guide was as follows: "Not Done = 0, insufficient performance = 1 and sufficient performance = 2.". The minimum score received from the guide is 0 and the maximum score is 48; as the total score received from the guide increases, the students' advocacy application skill levels are considered to be higher.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ege University

🇹🇷

Izmir, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath