The Effect of Repeated Simulation in Developing Social Justice Advocacy Attitudes and Skills on Nursing Student
- Conditions
- Nurse's RoleEducationNursing
- Interventions
- Behavioral: experimental group
- Registration Number
- NCT05966181
- Lead Sponsor
- Ege University
- Brief Summary
It is a randomized controlled experimental and single-blind study with a pretest-posttest control group design.
- Detailed Description
It is a randomized controlled experimental and single-blind study with a pretest-posttest control group design, planned to examine the effect of repeated simulation (standard patient simulation) on improving nursing students' social justice advocacy attitudes and skills.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 48
- Volunteering to participate in the research Being a 4th year undergraduate nursing student Having completed the theoretical education for vocational courses
- Being a foreign national (due to Turkish speaking/understanding problem)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description experimental group experimental group They will perform repetitive simulation (standard patient simulation according to scenarios) with the students in the experimental group. control group experimental group A single simulation will be applied to the control group (standard patient simulation according to scenarios).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Repeated simulation four weeks Repeated simulation is effective in developing nursing students' social justice advocacy attitudes and skills.
Students' social justice advocacy attitudes will be measured with the "Social Justice Advocacy Scale". The scale is a 7-point Likert-type scale. 1 means "Absolutely Not True" and 7 means "Absolutely True". The minimum score is 41 and the maximum score is 287 from the scale; it is stated that as the scores obtained from the scale increase, social justice advocacy skills also increase.
Students' advocacy skills will be measured with the "Social Justice Advocacy Skills Assessment Guide". The scoring in the guide was as follows: "Not Done = 0, insufficient performance = 1 and sufficient performance = 2.". The minimum score received from the guide is 0 and the maximum score is 48; as the total score received from the guide increases, the students' advocacy application skill levels are considered to be higher.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ege University
🇹🇷Izmir, Turkey