The Effect of Repeated Simulation in Developing Social Justice Advocacy Attitudes and Skills on Nursing Student

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Nurse's Role; Education; Nursing

• Registration Number: NCT05966181
• Lead Sponsor: Ege University

Brief Summary

It is a randomized controlled experimental and single-blind study with a pretest-posttest control group design.

Detailed Description

It is a randomized controlled experimental and single-blind study with a pretest-posttest control group design, planned to examine the effect of repeated simulation (standard patient simulation) on improving nursing students' social justice advocacy attitudes and skills.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2023-03-30
• Study First Submitted: 2023-07-21
• Study First Submitted QC: 2023-07-21
• Study First Posted: 2023-07-28
• Primary Completion: 2023-08-30
• Study Completion: 2023-09-30
• Status Verified: 2025-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-01-28
• Last Update Posted: 2025-01-29

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 48

Inclusion Criteria

• Volunteering to participate in the research Being a 4th year undergraduate nursing student Having completed the theoretical education for vocational courses

Exclusion Criteria

• Being a foreign national (due to Turkish speaking/understanding problem)

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Repeated simulation	four weeks	Repeated simulation is effective in developing nursing students' social justice advocacy attitudes and skills.; Students' social justice advocacy attitudes will be measured with the "Social Justice Advocacy Scale". The scale is a 7-point Likert-type scale. 1 means "Absolutely Not True" and 7 means "Absolutely True". The minimum score is 41 and the maximum score is 287 from the scale; it is stated that as the scores obtained from the scale increase, social justice advocacy skills also increase.; Students' advocacy skills will be measured with the "Social Justice Advocacy Skills Assessment Guide". The scoring in the guide was as follows: "Not Done = 0, insufficient performance = 1 and sufficient performance = 2.". The minimum score received from the guide is 0 and the maximum score is 48; as the total score received from the guide increases, the students' advocacy application skill levels are considered to be higher.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ege University; 🇹🇷 Izmir, Turkey