To compare .75% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine and .75% ropivacaine with fentanyl undergoing infraumblical surgeries under spinal anesthesia
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/01/061586
- Lead Sponsor
- Jawahar Lal medical college ajmer
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patient belonging to ASA class 1 and 2 undergoing various infraumblical surgeries
Exclusion Criteria
Patient refusal uncooperative
Any known history of allergies
Local pathology at the site of injection
Bleeding disorder
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To assess the efficacy of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.75% with dexmedetomidine vs hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.75 with fentanyl in patient undergoing lower abdominal surgeries under spinal anaesthesia within baselineTimepoint: To assess the efficacy of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.75% with dexmedetomidine vs hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.75 with fentanyl in patient undergoing lower abdominal surgeries under spinal anaesthesia within baseline
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To assess the duration of sensory & motor block, compare hemodynamic Changes if any total rescue analgesia consumption at baselineTimepoint: Assess as grading point system <br/ ><br>At baseline , at 4week ,at 8 week