Interventions to De-implement Unnecessary Antibiotic Prescribing for Children With Ear Infections
- Conditions
- Ear InfectionAcute Otitis MediaPediatric Infectious Disease
- Interventions
- Other: Changes to the electronic health record (EHR)Other: Individualized audit and feedback reporting for cliniciansOther: Clinician education sessionsOther: Use of a shared decision-making (SDM) aideOther: Shared decision-making (SDM) education
- Registration Number
- NCT06034080
- Lead Sponsor
- Denver Health and Hospital Authority
- Brief Summary
This study aims to improve care and reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for children with ear infections. The study will compare the effectiveness of a "gold standard" to a hybrid intervention combined with this gold standard, in order to identify steps to increase parent satisfaction for child ear infection care. The "gold standard" approach is a Health System Level Intervention. On its own, it involves clinician education, tools in electronic medical records, and audit and feedback reports for clinician prescribing habits. The hybrid intervention includes the elements of the health systems level intervention in addition to a Shared Decision-Making component, which allows for both an increase in the role parents play in their child's care, as well as clinician education for how to use this method. The goals of this work are to increase parent satisfaction, reduce antibiotics taken for childhood ear infections, align medical care with the current national guidelines, and evaluate differences in the two intervention groups. Both groups will be evaluated for implementation outcomes to improve dissemination and scalability for future use of these models in antibiotic prescribing for children with ear infections.
This study will recruit a diverse group of patients and clinicians to complete surveys, parents to participate in focus groups, and clinicians and administrators to be interviewed in order to meet study aims and receive sufficient feedback on the interventions performed. There are two hypotheses for this research: 1. The Hybrid Intervention will have higher parent satisfaction and reduced antibiotic use compared to the Health-System Level Intervention and 2. The Hybrid Intervention will be more challenging to implement than the Health-System Level Intervention, but will be preferred by parents, clinicians, and administrators.
- Detailed Description
Acute otitis media (AOM), commonly referred to as an ear infection, is the most common reason children are prescribed antibiotics, affecting 5 million children and resulting in 10 million antibiotic prescriptions annually. By 3 years of age over 60% of children will have had AOM. Though 84% of AOM episodes resolve without antibiotics, antibiotics are prescribed to \>95% of children. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends that most children with AOM do not receive an immediate antibiotic (an antibiotic to take right away) and instead be managed with watchful waiting, where an antibiotic is used only if the child worsens or does not improve. In clinical trials watchful waiting reduced antibiotic use by over 62% and did not result in increased complications, reduced parent satisfaction, or increased symptoms. Unfortunately, despite these trials \<5% of children with AOM are managed with watchful waiting. The use of antibiotics when not needed contributes to the development of antibiotic resistant organisms, which makes future infections more difficult to treat. Additionally, unnecessary antibiotics reduce pediatric quality of life and over 26% of children who take an antibiotic experience an adverse drug event (ADE). Thus, for every 100 children with AOM who take an antibiotic at least 26 children experience harm; whereas only 5 children have symptomatic benefit.
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two pragmatic interventions to improve patient-centered outcomes and reduce unnecessary antibiotics taken for AOM. Interventions will be conducted at 33 community-based clinics and/or urgent care centers across three distinct geographic regions in the United States. Randomization will occur at the clinic center level to either the gold standard approach or the hybrid intervention. The Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) will be used to guide implementation and the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework will be used to evaluate outcomes. A mixed-methods approach will be used in the pre-implementation and evaluation phases and will utilize quantitative analyses, semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and surveys.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1566
A. Implementation of Interventions 1. Clinic at a participating organization 2. Provides care to children with AOM 3. Administrative or local approval for participation
B. Secondary Electronic Health Record Data
- Aged 6 months-17-years-old (inclusive)
- Diagnosis of AOM by ICD10 code
C. Video recordings or direct observation of the use of a shared decision aid
Parent participation:
- Child aged 6 months-17 years (inclusive)
- Diagnosed with AOM by clinician
- Parent or legal guardian is present and is >=18 years or older
Clinician Participation:
- Licensed clinician and not a medical trainee
- Age 18 >= years or older
D. Pre-implementation interviews of clinicians and administrators
- Licensed clinician (physician or advanced practice clinician) that cares for children with AOM at a participating organization or an administrator/manager at a participating organization.
- Aged >=18 years-no maximum
E. Pre-implementation focus groups of parents
- Parent or legal guardian of a child aged 6 months-17 years (inclusive) that has had AOM diagnosed at a participating organization.
- 18 years of age or older and able/willing to consent
F. Parents enrolled for surveys
- Parent or legal guardian of a child aged 6 months-17 years (inclusive) that has had AOM diagnosed at a participating organization. 2. Willing to participate and able to complete electronic surveys at enrollment and 10 days after enrollment. 3. Working phone 4. Age >=18 years of age
G. Post-intervention focus groups of parents
- Parent or legal guardian of a child aged 6 months-17 years (inclusive) that has had AOM diagnosed at a participating organization.
- 18 years of age or older and able/willing to consent
H. Post-intervention surveys of clinicians and administrators
- Licensed clinician (physician or advanced practice clinician) that cares for children with AOM at a participating organization or an administrator/manager at a participating organization.
- Aged >=18 years-no maximum
A. Implementation of Interventions
- Clinics that exclusively provide telehealth
B. Secondary Electronic Health Record Data
- None
C. Video recordings or direct observation of the use of a shared decision aid
Parent participation:
- None
Clinician Participation:
- None
D. Pre-implementation interviews of clinicians and administrators 1. Medical trainee (student, resident, fellow, etc.)
E. Pre-implementation focus groups of parents
- None
F. Parents enrolled for surveys 1. Complicated or recurrent AOM as determined by the study team
G. Post-intervention focus groups of parents 1. None
H. Post-intervention surveys of clinicians and administrators
- Medical trainee (student, resident, fellow, etc.)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Health System Level (HSL) Intervention Individualized audit and feedback reporting for clinicians The HSL Intervention is based on the CDC Core Elements of Stewardship and the HSL intervention is recommended by national guidelines. Sites randomized to this arm will require: 1. A change in their Electronic Health Record to their prescription fields to align with national guidelines 2. Individualized feedback report to their clinicians and clinic overall 3. And virtual learning sessions and continuing medical education credits for clinicians. Hybrid Intervention Clinician education sessions The Hybrid Intervention will be comprised of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) and the HSL Intervention. A previously validated SDM aid for ear infection care will be implemented. The aid was developed using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and is freely available. Sites randomized to this arm will require all of the HSL components as well as: 1. Use of the Shared-Decision Aide 2. Clinician Education on SDM Hybrid Intervention Individualized audit and feedback reporting for clinicians The Hybrid Intervention will be comprised of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) and the HSL Intervention. A previously validated SDM aid for ear infection care will be implemented. The aid was developed using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and is freely available. Sites randomized to this arm will require all of the HSL components as well as: 1. Use of the Shared-Decision Aide 2. Clinician Education on SDM Health System Level (HSL) Intervention Changes to the electronic health record (EHR) The HSL Intervention is based on the CDC Core Elements of Stewardship and the HSL intervention is recommended by national guidelines. Sites randomized to this arm will require: 1. A change in their Electronic Health Record to their prescription fields to align with national guidelines 2. Individualized feedback report to their clinicians and clinic overall 3. And virtual learning sessions and continuing medical education credits for clinicians. Health System Level (HSL) Intervention Clinician education sessions The HSL Intervention is based on the CDC Core Elements of Stewardship and the HSL intervention is recommended by national guidelines. Sites randomized to this arm will require: 1. A change in their Electronic Health Record to their prescription fields to align with national guidelines 2. Individualized feedback report to their clinicians and clinic overall 3. And virtual learning sessions and continuing medical education credits for clinicians. Hybrid Intervention Changes to the electronic health record (EHR) The Hybrid Intervention will be comprised of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) and the HSL Intervention. A previously validated SDM aid for ear infection care will be implemented. The aid was developed using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and is freely available. Sites randomized to this arm will require all of the HSL components as well as: 1. Use of the Shared-Decision Aide 2. Clinician Education on SDM Hybrid Intervention Shared decision-making (SDM) education The Hybrid Intervention will be comprised of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) and the HSL Intervention. A previously validated SDM aid for ear infection care will be implemented. The aid was developed using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and is freely available. Sites randomized to this arm will require all of the HSL components as well as: 1. Use of the Shared-Decision Aide 2. Clinician Education on SDM Hybrid Intervention Use of a shared decision-making (SDM) aide The Hybrid Intervention will be comprised of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) and the HSL Intervention. A previously validated SDM aid for ear infection care will be implemented. The aid was developed using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and is freely available. Sites randomized to this arm will require all of the HSL components as well as: 1. Use of the Shared-Decision Aide 2. Clinician Education on SDM
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Increase in Parent Satisfaction 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection Survey responses will be measured by the percentage of "Very Satisfied" or "Extremely Satisfied" responses from parents on a 7-point Likert Scale. The survey tool will be created from adaptations to the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and the Acute Otitis Media Severity of Symptom Scale (AOM-SOS). In this survey, the higher scores on the Likert Scale will indicate more overall parent satisfaction.
Percentage of Patients Taking an Antibiotic for AOM 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection Comparing electronic health record prescription data with parent yes/no survey responses to a question on whether or not their child took an antibiotic prescribed for treating their ear infection.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Adverse Drug Events 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection Percentage of patients with adverse drug event(s)
Antibiotic Prescription Filled 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection Percentage of filled antibiotic prescriptions (even if not taken)
Shared Decision-Making At time of clinic visit for ear infection (0 Days) Summed score of the "Knowledge and Decisional Conflict Assessment" section of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM Q-9). The survey has a 6-Point Likert Scale ranging in values from "Completely Disagree" to "Completely Agree". For this survey, the higher the number on the Likert Scale, the better the outcome.
Pediatric Quality of Life 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection Score on the PEDS-QL Survey. This survey has a 5-Point Likert Scale ranging from "Never a Problem" (0 points) to "Almost Always a Problem" (4 points). Higher scores on this scale indicate worse outcomes while lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Symptom and Severity Duration 0 and 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection Scores on a Likert scale from the AOM-Severity of Symptom scale survey on the following measures:
1. Symptom Severity (at maximum and at 10 days)
2. Time to Symptom Improvement (from onset)
3. Time to All Symptom Resolution (from onset)
4. Time to Ear Pain Resolution (from onset)
5. Symptoms Resolved at Day 10 (yes/no)Management Strategy At time of clinic visit for ear infection (0 Days) Percentage of immediate antibiotic use
Missed Work/School/Daycare 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection Numbers of days child missed school/daycare and/or number of days parent(s) missed work
Treatment Failure 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection Percentage that changed their medication management (i.e., took an antibiotic if initially trying watchful waiting or tried a new antibiotic if initially immediately tried antibiotics)
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Denver Health and Hospital Authority
🇺🇸Denver, Colorado, United States
AllianceChicago
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Intermountain Health
🇺🇸Murray, Utah, United States