Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05212402
NCT05212402
Completed
N/A

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Assess the Physiological, Biochemical, and Psychometric Impacts of a Brand-Specific Hemp-Derived Cannabidiol Product in Healthy Adults

University of South Carolina1 site in 1 country56 target enrollmentJanuary 18, 2022

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Healthy
Sponsor
University of South Carolina
Enrollment
56
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Changes in red blood cell distribution width
Status
Completed
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is to assess the physiological, biochemical, and psychometric impacts of a brand-specific hemp-derived cannabidiol product in a sample of healthy adults.

Detailed Description

Cannabis contains several phyto-cannabinoids among which Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) are most widely known. THC is the main compound responsible for the psychoactive properties and also deemed responsible for several side-effects associated with cannabis. CBD, on the other hand, is not a strong cannabinoid receptor agonist and lacks psychotropic activity. However, due to its affinity for several other target sites, it is being studied for potential pharmacological properties. The diverse range of interactions at different receptor sites in the human body is believed to be responsible for therapeutic efficacy of CBD in treating kidney fibrosis, metabolic syndrome, anorexia, obesity, amelioration of osteoarthritis as well as several other musculoskeletal diseases. Recent research has also explored the use of CBD to relieve stress and depression, likely due to its agonistic influence on the 5-HT3 receptors as well as improving hippocampal neural growth and development. CBD has also been studied for its anti-oxidant activity, deemed on-par to that of Vitamin C in laboratory studies. The effect of CBD on inflammation and the immune system has been studied. The sedative effects of CBD have been investigated for the potential use of CBD as an anxiolytic and to improve mood as well as sleep. Recent studies have also explored the analgesic and pain-relieving properties of CBD, making it a suitable candidate that needs further investigations. Interestingly, a recent systematic review explored the use of CBD in viral diseases, with several pre-clinical studies indicating CBD as an effective candidate against viral disease. With the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been a strong interest in developing therapies to eliminate or reduce the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. SARS-CoV-2 uses Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) receptors to gain entry into the human body and penetrate the respiratory system. In a recent in vitro study, pretreatment with CBD in cells expressing ACE-2 receptor was effective in inhibiting the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in those cells. This is an interesting finding where further research is needed to study the influence of CBD consumption on ACE activity. Several studies of CBD safety have demonstrated lack of any safety concerns over a range of different doses. A recent safety study of CBD by Bergamaschi et al. demonstrated absence of any influence on the central nervous system, vital signs or mood changes as well as lack of any side effect observed for doses up to 1500 mg/day (orally) or 30 mg/day (intravenously).It has been hypothesized that the trace amounts of THC present within the CBD extract could potentially be responsible for any side-effects. Therefore, CBD is considered very safe for human consumption in the dose being tested in this study (\<200mg/day). Additional clinical research is required to confirm and support therapeutic use of CBD for being effective in modulating ACE expression, mood, stress, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunomodulating, sedative \& anxiolytic, analgesic, pain relieving and anti-viral therapeutic claims. This research will also help to understand any safety issues with the long-term regular use of CBD on healthy adults. Therefore, this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study will be conducted to explore the physiologic, biochemical, and psychometric impacts of a brand-specific hemp-derived CBD product in healthy adults.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 18, 2022
End Date
October 30, 2022
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Shawn M. Arent

Professor

University of South Carolina

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • body mass index of 19.0 to 34.9 kg/m2 (normal weight through Class I obesity)
  • Agree to refrain from alcohol consumption for at least 48 hours prior to each visit.
  • Willing to practice acceptable measures of birth control and sexually transmitted infections prevention by using double-barrier contraceptive measures (both males and females) throughout the study duration.
  • Willing and able to agree to the requirements and restrictions of this study including fasting before blood draw on all visits for laboratory assessment.
  • Willing to give voluntary consent, be able to understand and read the questionnaires, carry out all study-related procedures, communicate effectively with the study staff, and agree to allow any study related evaluations.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Have a known sensitivity or allergy to any of the investigational products or their ingredients.
  • Female participants who are lactating, pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study as confirmed at the baseline (visit 2) or male participants of reproductive potential in a heterosexual relationship planning a pregnancy as confirmed at the baseline visit.
  • Documented medical history of immune disorder (such as Human immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome), hepatitis B or hepatitis C, or reported immune disorder diagnosis.
  • Active psychiatric disorder requiring hospitalization within the 12 months prior to screening or currently on medication(s) to treat any psychiatric disorder(s).
  • Any cognitive impairment that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude study participation or compliance with study procedures (e.g., Alzheimer's, dementia).
  • History of malignancy or those with any first-degree relatives with a history of cancer (e.g., familial cancer disorders) within 5 years.
  • History of clinically significant cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, cerebrovascular, metabolic, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, neurological, hematological, autoimmune, lymphatic, psychiatric, chronic pain and sleep disorders, hepatobiliary (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones) or endocrine disorders, including individuals with Type I or Type II diabetes, or other clinically significant medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may preclude safe study participation.
  • Participants with controlled or uncontrolled hypertension including stage 1 hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥129 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure ≥89 mmHg).
  • Participants who are on medications as prescribed for any of the aforementioned exclusionary criteria. Participants on stable dose of thyroid medication (no dosage changes within last 3 months) are acceptable.
  • Consumption of prescription or non-prescription: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, barbiturates, cocaine, ethanol, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, protease inhibitors, warfarin, sildenafil, theophylline, tricyclic antidepressants and any other medications

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Changes in red blood cell distribution width

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on red blood cell distribution width concentration compared to placebo

Changes in angiotensin-renin converting enzyme (ACE)

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the test product (TP) has any effect on the activity of angiotensin-renin converting enzyme (ACE) compared to placebo

Changes in hematocrit

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on hematocrit compared to placebo

Changes in total mood disturbances

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on total mood disturbance assessed by the Profile of Mood States (POMS) compared to placebo The total mood is calculated by adding the negative subscales (tension, depression, fatigue, confusion, and anger) subtracting the positive subscales (vigor, esteem-related affect).

Changes in white blood cell count

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on white blood cell count compared to placebo

Changes in red blood cell count

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on red blood cell count compared to placebo

Changes in mean corpuscular volume

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on mean corpuscular volume compared to placebo

Changes in hemoglobin

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on hemoglobin compared to placebo

Changes in mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration compared to placebo

Changes in absolute and relative lymphocytes

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on absolute and relative lymphocytes compared to placebo

Changes in platelet count

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on platelet count compared to placebo

Changes in absolute and relative neutrophils

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on absolute and relative neutrophils compared to placebo

Changes in absolute and relative monocytes

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on absolute and relative monocytes compared to placebo

Changes in absolute and relative eosinophils

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on absolute and relative eosinophils compared to placebo

Changes in absolute and relative basophils

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on absolute and relative basophils compared to placebo

Changes in interleukin-6

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on interleukin-6 compared to placebo

Changes in subjective stress levels

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on stress levels assessed by Cohen's perceived stress scale compared to placebo. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 40. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Changes in sleep quality

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on sleep quality assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index compared to placebo. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 40. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Changes in anger-hostility

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on anger-hostility (POMS sub-score) compared to placebo. Min 0, max 48, higher scores are associated with worse outcomes.

Changes in mean platelet volume

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on mean platelet volume compared to placebo

Changes in interleukin-10

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on interleukin-10 compared to placebo

Changes in cold and flu prevalence

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on number of days of lost productivity (days taken off from work or school) due to cold/flu symptoms compared to placebo

Changes in fatigue-inertia

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on fatigue-inertia (POMS sub-score) compared to placebo. Min 0, Max 28, higher scores may be associated with worse outcomes.

Changes in vigor-activity

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on vigor-activity (POMS sub-score) compared to placebo. Min 0, max 32, higher scores are associated with better outcomes.

Changes in confusion-bewilderment

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on confusion-bewilderment (POMS sub-score) compared to placebo. Min 0, max 28, and higher scores are associated with worse outcomes.

Changes in Overall Body Pain/Discomfort Scale

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on body pain and discomfort assessed by the Overall Body Pain/Discomfort Scale compared to placebo, which is a validated dually anchored Likert 10-point scale. Min value is 0, the max is 10, and a higher value is a worse outcome.

Changes in foundation pain

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on foundation pain index which is calculated from urinalysis compared to placebo. Min 0 and Max 100, higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Changes in depression-dejection

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on depression-dejection (POMS sub-score) compared to placebo. Min 0, max 60, and higher scores are associated with worse outcomes.

Changes in TNF-alpha

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on TNF-alpha compared to placebo

Changes in tension-anxiety

Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3

To determine if the TP has an impact on tension-anxiety (POMS sub-score) compared to placebo. Min 0, max 60, higher scores are associated with worse outcomes.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Changes in blood urea nitrogen(Baseline, Month 3)
  • Changes in blood urea nitrogen as a marker of kidney function(Baseline, Month 3)
  • Changes in blood glucose(Baseline, Month 3)
  • Changes in serum albumin(Baseline, Month 3)
  • Changes in AST as a marker of liver function(Baseline, Month 3)
  • Changes in creatinine as a marker of kidney function(Baseline, Month 3)
  • Changes in potassium as a marker of kidney function(Baseline, Month 3)
  • Changes in total serum protein(Baseline, Month 3)
  • Changes in ALT as a marker of liver function(Baseline, Month 3)
  • Changes in electrolyte balance(Baseline, Month 3)
  • Changes in serum albumin/globulin ratio(Baseline, Month 3)
  • Changes in total serum bilirubin serum(Baseline, Month 3)
  • Changes in alkaline phosphatase as a marker of liver function(Baseline, Month 3)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials