跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05887921
NCT05887921已完成不适用

Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Penile Cancer: an Interim Report From a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Open vs. Video-endoscopic Approach

A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 14 人开始时间: 2019年4月30日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
14
试验地点
2
主要终点
Surgical outcomes of lymph drainage (ml)

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of the present study is to prospectively compare oncological and functional results of penile radical inguinal lymphadenectomy performed with an open versus videolaparoscopic technique.

The main questions it aims to answer are: evaluated the oncological and functional results of inguinal lymphadenectomy performed with minimally invasive techniques using videolaparoscopic instruments vs open inguinal lymphadenectomy according to the standard technique.

Participants will undergo treatment of the primary lesion and contextual inguinal lymphadenectomy:

  • Groin 1: open lymphadenectomy performed by a surgical team with extensive experience in traditional surgery
  • Groin 2: laparoscopic lymphadenectomy performed by a surgical team with extensive experience in minimally invasive surgery. The results of these procedures will be prospectively collected and compared.

详细描述

Penile cancer represents, to date, a rare oncological pathology (1/100000 males in Europe). However, in tertiary reference centres, such as the SCU Urologia (Prof. P.

Gontero), the number of patients sent for this pathology is increasing. Although for the main lesion (T) there are now consolidated standards of care, increasingly aimed at a conservative "sexual sparing" approach where oncologically possible, the management of loco-regional lymph nodes is still not completely standardized. The European Guidelines (EAU) recommend bilateral inguinal radical lymphadenectomy for cN1/N2 (palpable lymph nodes mono/bilaterally, but not fixed) or high-risk tumour (> T1G2). Lymph node management is the factor that most influences patient survival. For this reason, this must be entrusted to highly specialized centres. Some recent trials have shown that bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy has a statistically significant superiority to radiotherapy and clinical surveillance in cN1/N2 patients. Despite this, inguinal lymphadenectomy has an important incidence of morbidity (up to 50% of cases) which often wrongly limits its indications. Main complications are: Lymphocele

  • Prolonged lymphatic drainage
  • Skin necrosis
  • Dehiscence of the surgical wound
  • Edema of lower limbs and genitals Only few studies have recently evaluated the oncological and functional results of inguinal lymphadenectomy performed with minimally invasive techniques using videolaparoscopic instruments. First results seem to support minimally invasive approach, that appears to have comparable oncological results and less post-operative morbidity.

However, evidences are still extremely limited, and no high-grade recommendations can be made. The aim of the present study is to prospectively compare oncological and functional results of penile radical inguinal lymphadenectomy performed with an open versus videolaparoscopic technique.

20 patients with indication for inguinal lymphadenectomy (according to EAU 2019 Guidelines - in case of primary lesion > pT1G2 or in case of lymph node disease cN1/N2) will be enrolled. Each patient will undergo treatment of the primary lesion and contextual inguinal lymphadenectomy. The procedure will be performed in this way:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Male
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age of patients [45-80], CCI ≤
  • Penile tumour with inguinal lymphadenectomy indication, according to EAU 2019 guidelines. Written informed consent.

排除标准

  • Age of patients> 80, CCI ≥
  • Patients with lymphatic disorders of lower limbs. Patients with previous inguinal surgery/radiotherapy. Previous or concomitant diagnosis of other tumours.

结局指标

主要结局

Surgical outcomes of lymph drainage (ml)

时间窗: 24 months

Stratification of complications according to the international classification of Clavien-Dindo.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mirko Preto

MD, PhD

A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验