跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04632472
NCT04632472已完成不适用

Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, a Randomized Trial Comparing an Active Fixation Bipolar Left Ventricular Lead and Passive Fixation Quadripolar Leads

Haukeland University Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 62 人开始时间: 2016年2月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
62
试验地点
2
主要终点
Echocardiographic response

研究概览

简要总结

A prospective, randomized and patient-blinded trial comparing an active fixation left ventricular lead with quadripolar passive left ventricular leads. The leads were compared in order to identify differences in the electrical performance, the ability to achieve a stable proximal position in a coronary vein located concordant to target segment and clinical outcome. The patients were followed up for 12 months.

详细描述

A prospective, randomized and patient-blinded trial. The objective was to compare an active fixation left ventricular lead with quadripolar passive left ventricular leads. The left ventricular segment with latest mechanical activation was identified as target segment by radial strain speckle-tracking echocardiography.The leads were compared in order to identify differences in the electrical performance, the ability to achieve a stable proximal position in a coronary vein located concordant to target segment and clinical outcome. The clinical outcomes were assessed by echocardiography, change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). The patients were followed up for 12 months.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

盲法说明

Patient blinded The echocardiographic analyses were done blinded to type of left ventricular lead.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35 %
  • Electrocardiogram : left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QRS duration >120 ms or non-LBBB and QRS duration ≥150 ms
  • Optimal medical treatment.

排除标准

  • Upgrade procedures due to ventricular pacing
  • No written consensus

结局指标

主要结局

Echocardiographic response

时间窗: Day 0 (baseline). 6 and 12 months after implantation

Changes in left ventricular end-systolic volume (measured in milliliter).

The left ventricular lead long-axis position.

时间窗: At implant (day 0)

Measurement of the distance (millimeter) from the active electrode to coronary sinus. Fluoroscopic measurement in a right anterior oblique (RAO) view.

Ability to achieve a position in a coronary vein located concordant to target segment.

时间窗: At implant (day 0)

The left ventricular lead final position will be compared to the left ventricular target segment. The target segment is determined by radial strain speckle-tracking echocardiography. The lead position is classified as "concordant" or "not concordant".

The left ventricular lead pacing threshold

时间窗: Day 0 (baseline). 2, 6 and 12 months after implantation.

Changes in left ventricular lead pacing capture thresholds, measured in "Volt" with 0.4ms pulse width.

次要结局

  • Changes in NYHA functional Class(Day 0 (baseline). 2, 6 and 12 months after implantation)
  • Left ventricular lead impedances(Day 0 (baseline). 2, 6 and 12 months after implantation)
  • Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction(Day 0 (baseline). 6 and 12 months after implantation.)
  • Changes in MLHFQ score(Day 0 (baseline). 2, 6 and 12 months after implantation)

研究者

发起方
Haukeland University Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement, Comparison... | 临床试验