MedPath

Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Bilateral Primary Inguinal Hernia

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Bilateral Inguinal Hernia
Postoperative Complications
Interventions
Procedure: Bilateral TAPP Repair
Procedure: Open PP Repair
Procedure: Bilateral Lichtenstein Repair
Registration Number
NCT04357665
Lead Sponsor
University of Alexandria
Brief Summary

Currently, there is a controversy regarding the best approach for simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernia. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of laparoscopic versus open repair of bilateral inguinal hernia

Detailed Description

This prospective randomized study included 120 consecutive patients with bilateral primary inguinal hernia treated at Alexandria university hospital in the period between June 2014 and February 2017. Patients were randomized by sealed envelopes into 3 groups, each includes 40 patients. Group I treated by laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair using 2 separate meshes, Group II treated by open preperitoneal mesh repair, while Group III treated by bilateral Lichtenstein repair. The 3 groups were compared regarding: operative time, postoperative complications, pain, hospital stay, return to normal activity and work, chronic groin pain, patient's satisfaction and 3 years recurrence rate.

Statistical Analysis: Numerical data in both groups was expressed as mean

± standard deviation (SD) and compared using One-way analysis of variance while categorical data was expressed as percentages and compared using Chi-squared test. Logistic regression test was used to determine predictors of postoperative complications. Differences were considered significant at p \<0.05.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with primary bilateral inguinal hernias in patients aged from 20 to 60 years
Exclusion Criteria
    • Immune compromised patients,
    • Morbid obesity (BMI > 35 kg/m2)
    • Chronic liver or renal disease
    • Coagulopathy
    • High-risk patients unfit for major surgery (ASA III or IV)
    • Recurrent hernias
    • Complicated hernias
    • Massive scrotal hernias
    • Previous infra-umbilical surgery
  1. Persistent groin pain due to other causes

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Lap TAPP GroupBilateral TAPP RepairPatients treated by laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair using 2 separate meshes fixed by laparoscopic tackers
Open PP GroupOpen PP RepairPatients treated by open preperitoneal single mesh repair fixated using sutures
Bilateral LICHT GroupBilateral Lichtenstein RepairPatients treated by standard bilateral Lichtenstein repair using 2 separate meshes fixed by sutures
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Operative timeSame day of surgery

Operative time (in minutes)

Early postoperative complications30 days after the surgery

Any complications related to surgery developed within 30 days after the surgery

Postoperative pain 7 days after surgery7 days after surgery

Pain intensity was assessed using the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) with values ranging from 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Chronic postoperative pain3 months after surgery

Groin pain related to surgery lasting for more than 3 months after surgery

Hernia recurrence3 years after surgery

Unilateral or bilateral - residual or recurrent hernia within 3 years after surgery

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath