Comparison of the Effectiveness of Low-intensity Laser and ESWT Treatments in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- Sponsor
- Abant Izzet Baysal University
- Enrollment
- 90
- Primary Endpoint
- Visual Analog Scale
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common neuropathy of the median nerve. Conservative methods are used in mild and moderate CTS in the treatment. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of low-intensity laser and ESWT treatments in patients with mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed with EMG.
Detailed Description
Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common neuropathy of the median nerve. Its incidence increases between the ages of 40-60. Its prevalence is 4-5%, and incidence is 2.7%. It is more common in women than men. The vast majority of cases are idiopathic.The first symptoms usually start at night. The patient wakes up with a feeling of swelling without any visible swelling and symptoms such as burning, numbness and tingling in the median nerve region.In severe cases, hand weakness and thenar atrophy develop. Provocative tests such as phalen, reverse phalen, tinel, carpal compression test, tourniquet test can be used in the examination.The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome is made by nerve conduction studies and electromyography. Conservative methods are used in mild and moderate CTS in the treatment. Surgical methods are recommended in severe cases and in cases unresponsive to conservative treatment.One of the methods used in the treatment is Laser (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation).There are low and high intensity laser applications according to their energy densities. The basic mechanism of action is tissue stimulation. ESWT (Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy), another treatment method, shows therapeutic properties by focusing high-amplitude sound waves on the desired area of the body. Apart from the mechanical effect, it also has an effect at the cellular level.In previous studies, both low-intensity laser and ESWT application were found to be effective in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. However, as far as we know, there is no study comparing the efficacy of low-intensity laser therapy and ESWT therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of low-intensity laser and ESWT treatments in patients with mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed with EMG.
Investigators
Elif yaksi
Medical Doctor
Abant Izzet Baysal University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •18-65 years
- •Having a clinic compatible with carpal tunnel syndrome,
- •Patients with electrophysiological data compatible with mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome
Exclusion Criteria
- •Cervical radiculopathy , polyneuropathy , brachial plexopathy , thoracic outlet syndrome
- •Regular use of oral steroids or nsaii in the last 3 months
- •Systemic disease (DM, hypothyroidism, RA, gout, acromegaly, CKD, dialysis)
- •Severe carpal tunnel syndrome (kts)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: Post-treatment (3th week)
It is a 10 cm line on the horizontal plane where the patient evaluates the pain. There are lines from 0 to 10. 0 means no pain, and 10 means very severe pain. After this information is given to the patient, the patient will mark the pain they feel within 1 week.
Median nerve area measurement
Time Frame: Post-treatment (3th week)
It will be measured from the distal finger line by manually surrounding the nerve just below the hyperechoic line surrounding the median nerve with the ultrasound device.
Boston Scale
Time Frame: Post-treatment (3th week)
The Boston Questionnaire was developed by Levine et al. in 1993. It consists of two parts, the symptom severity scale and the functional capacity scale.Boston Symptom Severity Scale consists of 11 questions. Symptoms such as pain, numbness, weakness, tingling are questioned. Symptoms are scored using a 5-answer scale between "absent and very severe". In the scoring of 11-55, a high score is interpreted as increased symptom severity. Boston Functional Capacity Scale consists of 8 questions. It questions the degree of difficulty of activities of daily living, and each question has five different answers with a score between 1 and 5. The average score is obtained by dividing the total score by the number of questions. Results are scored between 8-40 and high values are interpreted as impaired hand functionality.
LANNS neuropathic pain scale
Time Frame: Post-treatment (3th week)
It is used to distinguish between neuropathic pain and nociceptive pain. It consists of 2 parts. The first part is filled by the patient. In the department, the physician tests whether allodynia is present. A score above 12 is classified as neuropathic pain.
Secondary Outcomes
- Ouick Dash Score(Post-treatment (3th week))
- Visual Analog Scale (paresteshia)(Post-treatment (3th week))