Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04817189
NCT04817189
Completed
Phase 4

MyRisk: Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Oral Akynzeo® in Patients Receiving MEC at High Risk of Developing CINV Based on a Prediction Tool: A Multinational and Multicenter Study

Helsinn Healthcare SA19 sites in 7 countries414 target enrollmentStarted: February 1, 2021Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Status
Completed
Enrollment
414
Locations
19
Primary Endpoint
The Probability of Complete Responses Over Three Cycles of Chemotherapy After the Start of the MEC Administration

Overview

Brief Summary

MyRisk: Efficacy and safety evaluation of oral Akynzeo® in patients receiving MEC at high risk of developing CINV based on a prediction tool. A multinational and multicenter study.

Antiemetic guidelines recommendations are based on the emetogenic potential of the chemotherapy. Chemotherapy (CT) agents are divided in Highly, Moderately, Low and Minimally Emetogenic potential.

In addition to type of chemotherapy, several patient-related risk factors can increase the risk of CINV (chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting). Currently, there is limited consensus surrounding the most relevant patient risk factors that may predict the risk of CINV. Based on a recent study by Dranitsaris et al. (Dranitsaris et al. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1; 28(6):1260-1267.), eight (8) predictive factors have been identified and an algorithm has been developed to incorporate these factors into the optimal selection of prophylactic antiemetics:

  1. nausea and/or vomiting in the prior cycle of chemotherapy
  2. use of non-prescribed antiemetics at home in the prior cycle of chemotherapy
  3. platinum or anthracycline-based chemotherapy
  4. age < 60 years
  5. expectations for (anticipating) nausea and/or vomiting
  6. <7 h of sleep the night before chemotherapy
  7. history of morning sickness during previous pregnancy
  8. cycle of chemotherapy (A negative association between risk and number of cycles was identified where the hazard for CINV was highest in cycles 1 and 2, with a gradual decline and plateau from cycle 3 onward).

The clinical application of this prediction tool has the potential to be an important resource for clinicians and may help to enhance patient care by optimizing the use of the antiemetics in a proactive manner.

Detailed Description

Antiemetic guideline recommendations are based on the emetogenic potential of chemotherapy and involve 4 levels of classification of intravenous chemotherapy agents, i.e., high, moderate, low and minimal; these have been accepted by major organisations. Moderate emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) results in acute vomiting in 30% to 90% of cancer patients in the absence of antiemetic therapy. In addition to the chemotherapy type, several patient-related risk factors and clinical characteristics can increase CINV risk. These can include use of antiemetics inconsistent with international guidelines, younger age, prechemotherapy nausea, no complete CINV response in an earlier cycle, history of nausea/vomiting, (trait) anxiety, fatigue experience, and expectations of nausea/vomiting. Other studies have largely confirmed some of the key risk factors for CINV (history of vomiting during pregnancy, history of motion sickness, age, gender) and added other factors such as (chronic) alcohol consumption, body surface area, fewer hours slept the night prior to infusion, or advanced stage cancer. Currently, there is a limited consensus surrounding the most relevant patient risk factors that may predict CINV risk. Based on a recent study by Dranitsaris et al. eight predictive factors have been identified, and an algorithm has been developed to combine these patient-related risk factors into the optimal treatment of prophylactic antiemetics. These include:

  1. nausea and/or vomiting in the prior cycle of chemotherapy
  2. use of non-prescribed antiemetics at home in the prior cycle of chemotherapy
  3. platinum or anthracycline-based chemotherapy
  4. age < 60 years
  5. expectations for (anticipating) nausea and/or vomiting
  6. <7 h of sleep the night before chemotherapy
  7. history of morning sickness during previous pregnancy
  8. cycle of chemotherapy (A negative association between risk and number of cycles was identified where the hazard for CINV was highest in cycles 1 and 2, with a gradual decline and plateau from cycle 3 onward).

Akynzeo®, an oral combination of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonists (NK1 RA), netupitant and the 5-hydroxytryptamine (HT3) receptor antagonists (5-HT3 RA), palonosetron, is recommended by guidelines for the prevention of CINV. Akynzeo® has been evaluated in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy phase II clinical trial at various dose ranges among 694 cisplatin-treated cancer patients from 44 sites (two countries); each NEPA (netupitant-palonosetron) dose significantly improves CINV prevention in cancer patients. Similar results were obtained in another international, randomised, double-blind and parallel group phase III clinical trial; NEPA prevented CINV in patients receiving MEC.

The current study primarily aimed to evaluate whether Akynzeo® leads to a higher response rate compared with standard care in MEC regimen-treated patients who are identified to be at high risk based on the algorithm.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients aged ≥18 years
  • Patients with a risk score of ≥ 13 as calculated by the algorithm - see 3.6.3.
  • Baseline/screening: VISIT 0
  • Signed Informed consent
  • Both sexes
  • Patients with diagnosis of any cancer scheduled and intended to be treated for three consecutive cycles with a single dose of any IV MEC regimen, per cycle, including adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2
  • Use of Standard of Care defined as a 5-HT3 RA + Dexamethasone (or equivalent corticosteroid) based-regimen on day 1 of chemotherapy for CINV prevention
  • Naïve and non- naïve to chemotherapy
  • The enrolled women should be a) of non-childbearing potential or b) of childbearing potential using reliable contraceptive measures and having a negative urine pregnancy test done by health care team within 1-24 hours before dosing the antiemetic treatment in both arms and outcome recorded in the medical records

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (including anthracycline+cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy)
  • Patients receiving oral moderately emetogenic chemotherapy drugs
  • Patients receiving opioids within 2 weeks prior to trial enrollment (longer use allowed)
  • Use of olanzapine as prophylaxis of CINV
  • Patients scheduled to receive radiotherapy concurrently with chemotherapy
  • Any illness or condition that, in the opinion of the physician, may confound the results of the study or pose unwarranted risks in administering the investigational product to the patient.
  • Patients with mechanical risk factors for nausea (i.e. intestinal obstruction)
  • Patients with liver disease (as nausea is a common presenting symptom)
  • Patients with metabolic risk factors for nausea (i.e. electrolyte imbalances causing nausea/vomiting)
  • Chronic treatment with steroids (with the exception of inhaled or topical steroids)

Arms & Interventions

NEPA (300mg netupitant/0.5mg palonosetron) + Dexamethasone 8 mg

Experimental

Oral netupitant/palonosetron (300 mg/0.50 mg) fixed-dose combination on Day 1 of each cycle.

Dexamethasone (8 mg) will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle.

Intervention: NEPA (300mg netupitant/0.5mg palonosetron) (Drug)

NEPA (300mg netupitant/0.5mg palonosetron) + Dexamethasone 8 mg

Experimental

Oral netupitant/palonosetron (300 mg/0.50 mg) fixed-dose combination on Day 1 of each cycle.

Dexamethasone (8 mg) will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle.

Intervention: Dexamethasone, 8 mg (oral) or equivalent IV dose (Drug)

Standard of care + Dexamethasone 8 mg

Active Comparator

Dexamethasone (or equivalent corticosteroids) 8 mg administered by the oral route (or equivalent IV dose) on Day 1, approximately 1 hour before chemotherapy and one of the 5-HT3-RAs recommended by European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) guidelines (standard of care), i.e. either:

Granisetron, 2 mg (oral) or 1 mg (IV) OR Palonosetron, 0.5 mg (oral), 0.25mg (IV) OR Ondansetron, 16 mg (oral) or 8 mg (IV) OR Dolasetron 100 mg (oral) OR Tropisetron 5 mg (oral or IV)

Intervention: Granisetron, 2 mg (oral) or 1 mg (IV) OR Palonosetron, 0.5 mg (oral), 0.25mg (IV) OR Ondansetron, 16 mg (oral) or 8 mg (IV) OR Dolasetron 100 mg (oral) OR Tropisetron 5 mg (oral or IV) (Drug)

Standard of care + Dexamethasone 8 mg

Active Comparator

Dexamethasone (or equivalent corticosteroids) 8 mg administered by the oral route (or equivalent IV dose) on Day 1, approximately 1 hour before chemotherapy and one of the 5-HT3-RAs recommended by European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) guidelines (standard of care), i.e. either:

Granisetron, 2 mg (oral) or 1 mg (IV) OR Palonosetron, 0.5 mg (oral), 0.25mg (IV) OR Ondansetron, 16 mg (oral) or 8 mg (IV) OR Dolasetron 100 mg (oral) OR Tropisetron 5 mg (oral or IV)

Intervention: Dexamethasone, 8 mg (oral) or equivalent IV dose (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The Probability of Complete Responses Over Three Cycles of Chemotherapy After the Start of the MEC Administration

Time Frame: At the end of all three chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).

To evaluate if the use of NEPA (netupitant and palonosetron) in patients treated with IV moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and at high risk of CINV is more effective in preventing CINV than a standard of care antiemetics over three cycles of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the probability of complete responses (no emetic episode and no rescue medication), during the overall phase (0-120h), after the start of the MEC administration over three cycles of chemotherapy. This endpoint is evaluated in patients with at least one reported cycle assessment. The model-based statistics of generalized linear model were used to calculate the difference in the probability to experience a "per cycle" CINV Indicators between the treatment arms.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Evaluation of the Probability of Acute (0 to 24 Hours), Delayed (>24 to 120 Hours), and Overall (0-120 Hours) CINV Indicators in Each Cycle of Chemotherapy(At the end of each cycle and after all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of the Predictive Role of Potential Risk Factors in the Development of CINV Over Three Cycles of Chemotherapy(At the end of each cycle and after all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of the Safety Profile of the Antiemetic Drug Over Three Cycles of Chemotherapy - the Frequency of Adverse Events (AE)(At the end of all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of the Safety Profile of the Antiemetic Drug Over Three Cycles of Chemotherapy - Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events(At the end of all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Number of Participants With Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events(At the end of all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Percentage of Participants With Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events(At the end of all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Number of Participants With Death Due to Adverse Events(At the end of all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Adverse Events(At the end of all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Exploration of the Effect of CINV on Daily Activities and Quality of Life in Patients Receiving Moderately-emetogenic Chemotherapy Over Three Cycles of Chemotherapy(At the end of chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of Resource Utilization and Health Economic Outcome - Number of Days With Rescue Medication Administered for the Treatment of CINV(At the end of each cycle and after all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of Resource Utilization and Health Economic Outcome - Daily Doses of Rescue Medication Administered for the Treatment of CINV(At the end of each cycle and after all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of Resource Utilization and Health Economic Outcome - the Number of Re-hydration Bags(At the end of each cycle and after all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of Resource Utilization and Health Economic Outcome - the Number of Days of Unplanned Hospitalisations(At the end of each cycle and after all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of Resource Utilization and Health Economic Outcome - the Number of Outpatient Physician Visits(At the end of each cycle and after all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of Resource Utilization and Health Economic Outcome - the Number of Unplanned Laboratory Test(At the end of each cycle and after all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of Resource Utilization and Health Economic Outcome - Discontinuation of Chemotherapy Treatment Due to CINV(At the end of each cycle and after all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of Resource Utilization and Health Economic Outcome - the Number of Delays of Chemotherapy Administration Due to CINV(At the start of cycles 2 and 3. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of Resource Utilization and Health Economic Outcome - the Average Length of Delay of Chemotherapy Administration Due to CINV(At the start of Cycles 2 and 3. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of Resource Utilization and Health Economic Outcome - Days of Absence From Work(At the end of each cycle and after all 3 chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)
  • Evaluation of Acute (0 to 24 Hours), Delayed (>24 to 120 Hours), and Overall (0-120 Hours) CINV Indicators in Each Cycle of Chemotherapy(At the end of chemotherapy cycles. The length of a cycle depends on the treatment being given (cycles range from 2 to 6 weeks).)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (19)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
MyRisk: Efficacy and safety evaluation of oral Akynzeo® in patients receiving MEC at high risk of developing CINV based on a prediction tool. A multinational and multicenter study.Patients treated with IV moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and at high risk of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)Therapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Cancer [C04]
EUCTR2019-004686-41-CZHelsinn Healthcare SA530
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
MyRisk: Efficacy and safety evaluation of oral Akynzeo® in patients receiving MEC at high risk of developing CINV based on a prediction tool. A multinational and multicenter study.Patients treated with IV moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and at high risk of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)Therapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Cancer [C04]
EUCTR2019-004686-41-ESHelsinn Healthcare SA530
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
MyRisk: Efficacy and safety evaluation of oral Akynzeo® in patients receiving MEC at high risk of developing CINV based on a prediction tool. A multinational and multicenter study.
EUCTR2019-004686-41-DEHelsinn Healthcare SA530
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
MyRisk: Efficacy and safety evaluation of oral Akynzeo® in patients receiving MEC at high risk of developing CINV based on a prediction tool. A multinational and multicenter study.Patients treated with IV moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and at high risk of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)Therapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Cancer [C04]
EUCTR2019-004686-41-GRHelsinn Healthcare SA530
Recruiting
Phase 4
Akynzeo as Antiemetic Treatment in Patients With Endometrial CancerEndometrial Cancer
NCT06726291Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano84