MedPath

Rehabilitation Protocol for Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Knee Ligament Surgery

Not Applicable
Conditions
Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Rehabilitation
Interventions
Other: standard ACL reconstruction rehabilitation protocol
Other: partial knee immobilization protocol
Registration Number
NCT03505359
Lead Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Brief Summary

Introduction: Individuals with an ACL lesion present abnormal rotational stability. Among the structures located in the anterolateral region of the knee that could act as restraints of the rotational knee lassitude, there is the Anterior Lateral Ligament (ALL), and its reconstruction associated with ACL reconstruction could reduce recurrence injury rates. Objective: to develop a rehabilitation protocol for patients undergoing combined reconstruction of ACL and ALL. METHOD: Articles published with patients submitted to ACL reconstruction with an anatomic technique and flexor tendon graft, (which is the same one adopted in this study), were selected as a base to this protocol. Discussion: The results will provide important information on clinical practice, since it can help identify the necessity or not of restraining the knee range of motion in combined surgeries. It can guide the therapeutic planning, including the cost of knee restraint devices, in addition to estimating these patients prognosis. The protocol with partial restriction of knee range of motion in the first 6 weeks of postoperative is the most indicated program in the rehabilitation of the combined surgeries of ACL and ALL reconstruction.

Detailed Description

Currently, the anatomical reconstruction of the ACL has been widely used, with the purpose of increasing the knee rotational control after the injury, and thus, to improve the clinical evolution in the long term. The concept involves restoring knee kinematics by improving function by reducing the number of graft failures, delaying or preventing degeneration of the joint. Normally, rehabilitation protocols in these cases are more careful with respect to knee ROM gain and use of exercises in open kinetic chain, with the purpose of preserving the graft.

Allied to this concept, the use of extra-articular reconstruction associated with ACL reconstruction, gained new horizons with the discovery of ALL, signaling to the possibility of a better rotational control and, consequently, a decrease in the number of graft failures.

Due to the particularities of each surgical technique, it is necessary that the rehabilitation protocols adapt to the different methods, guaranteeing the functional recovery, but without damages to the reconstruction.

With the proposal of ACL reconstruction surgery associated with ALL reconstruction, it is necessary to develop a specific rehabilitation protocol for these patients, considering some postoperative specificities of extra-articular reconstructions, since they are data that are not available in the literature until now.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
28
Inclusion Criteria
  • Males
  • Aged from 18 to 40 years
  • Documented and symptomatic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury followed by ACL+ anterolateral ligament (ALL) ligament reconstruction
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with multiple ligament injuries
  • Bilateral ACL injury

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Control groupstandard ACL reconstruction rehabilitation protocolGroup treated by a standard protocol for ACL reconstruction.
Experimental grouppartial knee immobilization protocolGroup treated by the new protocol with partial knee immobilization
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Knee Function12 months

Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale: instrument consisting of eight domains: limping, support, re-straining, instability, pain, swelling, climbing stairs and squatting, with closed-answers alternatives. The final result is expressed in nominal and ordinal form, being "excellent" ranging from 95 to 100 points; "Good" from 84 to 94 points; "Regular" between 65 and 83 and "bad" when values are equal to or less than 64.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Static Postural Control3 weeks; 6 weeks; 12 weeks; 6 months and 12 months

Static Postural Control will be assessed through the AccuSuway mobile power platform.(AMTI®).

Muscle strength3 weeks; 6 weeks; 12 weeks; 6 months and 12 months

The isometric and isokinetic strength test will be performed by an isokinetic dynamometry (Biodex Multi-Joint System III), used to record the torque of the knee flexor and extensor muscles, as well as the hip abductors.

Dynamic Postural Control3 weeks; 6 weeks; 12 weeks; 6 months and 12 months

Dynamic Postural Control will be assessed through the Balance Master System (BMS) platform.

Follow-up of knee function3 weeks; 6 weeks; 12 weeks; 6 months

Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale: instrument consisting of eight domains: limping, support, re-straining, instability, pain, swelling, climbing stairs and squatting, with closed-answers alternatives. The final result is expressed in nominal and ordinal form, being "excellent" ranging from 95 to 100 points; "Good" from 84 to 94 points; "Regular" between 65 and 83 and "bad" when values are equal to or less than 64.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

USaoPauloGH

🇧🇷

São Paulo, Brazil

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath