MedPath

Comparison of the Different Exercises on Chronic Neck Pain

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pain, Neck
Neck Pain
Interventions
Other: Group 2
Other: Group 3
Other: Group 1
Registration Number
NCT05488756
Lead Sponsor
Biruni University
Brief Summary

Neck pain is a widespread problem in the general population and is second only to low back pain in musculoskeletal issues.

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to compare the conventional therapy, cervical stabilization exercise approach, and core stabilization exercise in addiction to cervical stabilization in patients with chronic neck pain.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
45
Inclusion Criteria
  • Chronic neck pain more than 3 months
  • Medically stable
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with benign or tumors in the cervical region
  • Patients with active, localized osseous and discal infection in the spine (spondylodiscitis)
  • Patients with history of spinal fractures
  • Patients with congenital anomaly
  • Patients with neck surgery and spinal instability

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group 2Group 2Conventional training plus deep cervical flexor exercises
Group 3Group 3Conventional training plus stabilization exercises of the neck and core region
Group 1Group 1Conventional training plus isometric neck exercises
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain Intensity Assessment4 weeks

The 11-point Verbal Numeric Pain Scale (VNPS; 0 means no pain; 10 means worst pain) will be use to assess pain intensity. The VNPS is a reliable and valid measure for subjective pain measurement. Participants will be asked to report the pain severity at that moment on a scale from 0 to 10.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Disability Evaluation4 weeks

Neck Disability Index will be used to evaluate daily activities and ability. The form contains of 10 questions related to pain intensity, lifting, concentration, reading, headache, self-management, driving, working, sleeping, and daily activities. The score of each question is 0-5 according to the options and the total score is recorded by adding the scores of all answers. The lower the total score of the test, the less the effect of pain on performance in daily activities. The higher the score, the greater the performance of daily activities is affected.

Posture Evaluation4 weeks

Reedco's posture score will be used in posture evaluation. The score is a standard tool and it is administered by visual inspection of 10 postural traits viewed laterally (sagittal view including neck, upper back, trunk, abdomen, and lower back) or from behind (coronal view including head, shoulders, spine, hips, and ankles). The scores are marked as follows: a value of 0 equals poor posture or severe deviation, a value of 5 equals fair posture or minimal to moderate deviation, and a value of 10 equals good posture or normal alignment. The maximum score of 100 indicates good posture and a score of 59% or less is recorded as postural dysfunction.

Evaluation of Cervical Range of Motion4 weeks

Cervical ROM will be evaluated using a goniometer while the patient sitting on the chair with both feet on the ground. In the evaluation, after the goniometer is brought to the neutral position, the patient is asked to perform the desired movement with the head: flexion, extension, right and left lateral flexion, right and left rotation. A degree will be recorded for each neck motion and be used in the average analysis

Demografic Characteristic of Participants1 week before the first treatment session

The general demographic information of participants such as gender, age, body mass index will be recorded in a form created by investigators. Body mass index (BMI) values will be calculated by dividing body weights by the square of the height and be expressed in kg/m2.

Assessment of Quality of Life4 weeks

The Short Form-36 is a test that includes a 36-item self-administered comprehensive health status questionnaire and will be used to assess the quality of life. This test includes questions evaluating physical function, social function, limitations due to physical health, limitations due to mental health, vitality, body pain, and general health. In this test, two scores are generally calculated, the combined physical and mental summary score. Higher scores indicate higher quality of life.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Eylül Pınar Kısa

🇹🇷

İ̇stanbul, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath