跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/03/081881
CTRI/2025/03/081881尚未招募Phase 3 4

Effects of Traditional sitz bath vs Hot-Cold-Hot (HCH) sitz bath in post anal sphincterotomy patients with chronic anal fissure- A Randomized controlled trial.

AIIMS Jodhpur1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 82 人开始时间: 2025年3月17日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
Phase 3 4
状态
尚未招募
发起方
AIIMS Jodhpur
入组人数
82
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare the mean Post defecation pain on POD 7

研究概览

简要总结

Traditional Sitz bath, an age-old therapeutic process widely used in perianal pathologies. Many modifications of the sitz bath have been tried. With the help of our current study, we are trying to compare the effect of traditional sitz bath vs Hot-Cold-Hot (HCH) sitz bath in post-anal sphincterotomy patients with chronic anal fissure

Research Question:

Is Hot-Cold-Hot (HCH) sitz bath superior to traditional sitz bath in post anal sphincterotomy patients with chronic anal fissure?

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 99.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 1.Post operative patients of anal fissure.
  • 2.Mental Ability to understand and follow the intervention 3.Physical ability to perform the intervention.

排除标准

  • 1.Sever Cardiovascular diseases.
  • 2.Pregnancy.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare the mean Post defecation pain on POD 7

时间窗: post operative day (POD) 7

次要结局

  • 1.To compare the post defecation Pain score on POD 1st & 7th POD.(2.To compare the mean Post defecation perianal burning sensation on POD 1st & 7th POD.)

研究者

发起方
AIIMS Jodhpur
申办方类型
Government medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验