MedPath

Use of Rhythmic Auditory Cueing During Bilateral Training of the Upper Extremities in Stroke Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hemiplegia, Spastic
Interventions
Other: Bilateral arm training
Other: Rhythmic Auditory Cueing
Other: Conventional physical therapy program
Registration Number
NCT04939493
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine the effect of rhythmic auditory cueing with bilateral arm training on upper limb functions in stroke patients.

Detailed Description

Arm and hand movement problems are major contributors to disability in patients after stroke. In fact, only 5% of adults regain full arm function after stroke, and 20% regain no functional use. Hence, alternative strategies are needed to reduce the long-term disability and functional impairment from upper limb hemiparesis.

To solve problems concerning upper limb dysfunction related to stroke, various treatment methods have been used in several previous studies. Rhythmic auditory stimulation has been reported as an effective intervention for improving movement in the affected extremities of stroke patients.

To the best of our knowledge, no mentioned previous studies evaluating the effect of rhythmic auditory cueing with bilateral arm training using functional exercises on upper extremity impairment in patients with stroke in Egypt are reported. So, this study aims to determine the effect of rhythmic auditory cueing with bilateral arm training on upper limb functions in patients with stroke.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Thirty patients with ischemic stroke from both sexes will be included.
  2. Patients will have stroke for the first time.
  3. The age of patients will range from 45 to 60 years.
  4. Duration of illness will be from six months to eighteen months.
  5. The degree of spasticity will ranged from 1 to 1 + grade according to the modified Ashworth scale.
  6. Patients will have moderate arm motor impairment (between 30 and 49 scores) according to Fugl-Meyer (FM) arm section scale.
  7. The affected upper extremity will be the dominant side.
  8. Patients will be able to sit and maintain balance in a sitting position.
Exclusion Criteria
  • The patients will be excluded if they have:

    1. Visual or auditory deficits.
    2. Perceptual disorders.
    3. Any surgical interventions in the upper extremities limiting the range of motion.
    4. Aphasia or apraxia.
    5. Musculoskeletal or neurological impairment of the unaffected upper extremity.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Rhythmic Auditory CueingConventional physical therapy programGroup (B): Patients in this group will receive the same designed physical therapy program given to the control group in addition to auditory cueing during bilateral arm training using the metronome.
Bilateral arm trainingBilateral arm trainingPatients in this group will receive a standard physical therapy program in addition to Bilateral arm training.
Rhythmic Auditory CueingRhythmic Auditory CueingGroup (B): Patients in this group will receive the same designed physical therapy program given to the control group in addition to auditory cueing during bilateral arm training using the metronome.
Rhythmic Auditory CueingBilateral arm trainingGroup (B): Patients in this group will receive the same designed physical therapy program given to the control group in addition to auditory cueing during bilateral arm training using the metronome.
Bilateral arm trainingConventional physical therapy programPatients in this group will receive a standard physical therapy program in addition to Bilateral arm training.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessing the change in Upper Extremity Motor PerformanceBaseline and 6 weeks post-intervention

Assessment via using Upper Extremity Motor Performance scale. This scale has been shown to be valid and reliable, and it correlates well with inter joint upper extremity coordination. It has a maximum score of 66

Assessing the change in upper limb Motor FunctionBaseline and 6 weeks post-intervention

Assessment via using Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) The final time score will be the median time required for all timed tasks executed. One hundred twenty seconds is the maximum time allowed for each task attempted Timing is carried out using a stopwatch.

Assessing the change in gross manual dexterityBaseline and 6 weeks post-intervention

Assessment via using Box and Block Test Involves moving 1-inch cube blocks from a rectangular box container to another container, and the number of blocks moved by each hand in 60 seconds is determined using stop watch

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Outpatient clinic - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Cairo University

🇪🇬

Dokki, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath