Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite;Oral Hygiene, Pain and Treatment Effect
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 16
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Measure distance of insicors intrusion
研究概览
简要总结
Compare the tooth borne versus fixed orthodontic intrusive system (TADs) for the correction of anterior deep overbite
详细描述
this study determined which method was more compliant, efficacy and comfortable. It was performed to evaluate intrusion of upper incisors with applying tooth borne system as Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA) and temporary anchorage devices (TADs) [miniscrew] and evaluate the dental and skeletal cephalometric effects of these intrusion methods on individuals with deep bite caused by supraocclusion of upper incisors. It also evaluated oral hygiene and pain sensation in the two groups during the study period.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 15 Years 至 22 Years(Child, Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Class I or Class II malocclusion with minimal crowding.
- •70% to 100% overbite.
- •High lip line with gingival display on smiling and super-eruption of maxillary incisors.
- •All patients had permanent dentition with average to vertical growth pattern and curve of Spee of 4mm or less.
排除标准
- •Having missing teeth on the anterior maxillary area.
- •Any history of trauma or root canal treatment.
- •Previous orthodontic treatment.
- •Low lip line duing social smile.
- •Having any hormonal disorder or syndromes.
结局指标
主要结局
Measure distance of insicors intrusion
时间窗: 2 years
measure in mm the distance of apical movement
次要结局
- Pain intensity(8 months)
