跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06430710
NCT06430710已完成不适用

Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite;Oral Hygiene, Pain and Treatment Effect

Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 16 人开始时间: 2022年9月25日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
16
试验地点
1
主要终点
Measure distance of insicors intrusion

研究概览

简要总结

Compare the tooth borne versus fixed orthodontic intrusive system (TADs) for the correction of anterior deep overbite

详细描述

this study determined which method was more compliant, efficacy and comfortable. It was performed to evaluate intrusion of upper incisors with applying tooth borne system as Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA) and temporary anchorage devices (TADs) [miniscrew] and evaluate the dental and skeletal cephalometric effects of these intrusion methods on individuals with deep bite caused by supraocclusion of upper incisors. It also evaluated oral hygiene and pain sensation in the two groups during the study period.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
15 Years 至 22 Years(Child, Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Class I or Class II malocclusion with minimal crowding.
  • 70% to 100% overbite.
  • High lip line with gingival display on smiling and super-eruption of maxillary incisors.
  • All patients had permanent dentition with average to vertical growth pattern and curve of Spee of 4mm or less.

排除标准

  • Having missing teeth on the anterior maxillary area.
  • Any history of trauma or root canal treatment.
  • Previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Low lip line duing social smile.
  • Having any hormonal disorder or syndromes.

结局指标

主要结局

Measure distance of insicors intrusion

时间窗: 2 years

measure in mm the distance of apical movement

次要结局

  • Pain intensity(8 months)

研究者

发起方
Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls
申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验