Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2025/10/095623
CTRI/2025/10/095623
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable

Comparison of head positions (Sniffing vs Extension) for awake flexible bronchoscope guided nasotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway: a Randomized controlled trial

JIPMER1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: October 27, 2025Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
JIPMER
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Time to view the vocal cords

Overview

Brief Summary

Awake fiberoptic bronchoscope oral intubation (AFOI) is widely regarded as the gold standard for airway management in patients with difficult airways. Various factors influence the success of this technique, including sedation methods, airway anatomy, and head positioning

Management of the difficult airway has been a critical topic in anesthesiology for decades. Difficult airway incidences range from 0.3% to 13%, and nearly 30% of anesthesia-related mortalities are directly linked to airway complications. (2) Thus, awake fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) intubation has emerged as the gold standard for securing airways in patients with anticipated difficulties.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18.00 Year(s) to 65.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • 1.Adult patients aged 18-65 years uundergoing elective surgeries.
  • 2.American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status 1, 2 and 3 requiring awake Flexible bronchoscope guided nasotracheal intubation for airway management during anesthesia administration.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time to view the vocal cords

Time Frame: Time to view the vocal cords

Secondary Outcomes

  • 1. To evaluate and compare Time taken for viewing the tracheal rings (TVTR) between ‘Group SP’ and ‘Group EP’
  • To evaluate and compare Time taken for successful endotracheal tube placement (TETP) between ‘Group SP’ and ‘Group EP’
  • To compare Number of Attempts between ‘Group SP’ and ‘Group EP’
  • To compare Ease of intubation between ‘Group SP’ and ‘Group EP’
  • To evaluate and compare Hemodynamic alterations of the patients during intubation between ‘Group SP’ and ‘Group EP’

Investigators

Sponsor
JIPMER
Sponsor Class
Research institution and hospital
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr Rohithkrishna B

Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials