跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04742647
NCT04742647招募中不适用

Single Versus Double Suture Cervical Cerclage to Prevent Preterm Birth: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Stony Brook University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 84 人开始时间: 2021年2月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
84
试验地点
2
主要终点
Preterm delivery <28 weeks gestation

研究概览

简要总结

Cerclage placement is known to be beneficial in prevention of preterm birth when placed inn a certain subset of patients. Clinically, the number of sutures can also vary by surgeon preference to one or two sutures in one procedure. This is often decided in the operating room (OR) on the day of surgery but is poorly studied in the efficacy of maintaining the closed cervical length. Retrospective data found no significant benefit on placing two stitches instead of one in preterm birth rate but was extremely limited and heterogenous in many clinical characteristic among the cerclage procedures. There were suggestions that two cerclage sutures may reduce the risk of cerclage revision, birth before 20 weeks, and a nonsignificant improvement in outcome of early preterm deliveries. Therefore, two randomized controlled trials, one prospective study and one meta-analysis were performed. They did suggest a beneficial effect of double cerclage on obstetrical outcomes especially in earlier preterm birth rates although all were limited in sample size and therefore power. A randomized control trial with adequate sample size is still needed to answer the question of whether double cervical cerclage suture is more beneficial than a single suture. Therefore, we propose conducting a randomized control trial between a single or double suture in prophylactic and ultrasound indicated cerclage procedures.

详细描述

Preterm birth (PTB), defined as birth at less than 37 completed weeks is the leading cause for neonatal mortality and morbidity in the USA. The most common risk factor for PTB is a prior preterm birth. The etiology includes several risk factors including prior preterm birth, cervical insufficiency, short cervical length, low socioeconomic and educational status, extremes of maternal age, genital tract infection/colonization, smoking, underlying chronic disease, uterine anomalies, cervical surgery, injury to the endometrium, race, and exposure to environmental factors. The objective of our study specifically focuses on cervical insufficiency and a short cervical length at <24 weeks gestation defined as less than 25 mm as measured by transvaginal ultrasonography. It is well known that infants born prematurely have increased morbidity and mortality, including respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, long term health and neurologic abnormalities, extensive hospital stays, neonatal death, etc. The risks are significantly more pronounced at earlier gestational ages. Cervical cerclage, when indicated, has been shown to be beneficial in reducing preterm birth rates and therefore decrease adverse neonatal outcomes, perinatal morbidity, and mortality. The indications for cervical cerclage include a history of recurrent second trimester losses and/or PTB (history indicated), short cervical length (<2.5cm on transvaginal ultrasound (ultrasound indicated), or a dilated cervix on physical exam (physical exam indicated). Our study focuses on history and ultrasound indicated cerclage.

There are various surgical approaches to placement of cervical cerclages- transvaginal and transabdominal. Our study focuses on the transvaginal approach and the modified McDonald technique with transvaginal placement of a purse-string suture at the cervicovaginal junction. Suture material varies by the surgeon's preference and can involve monofilament suture (Prolene), polyester fiber (Mersilene tape), or a braided polyester suture (Ti-Cron or Ethibond). Clinically, the number of sutures can also vary by surgeon preference to one or two sutures in one procedure. This is often decided in the operating room (OR) on the day of surgery but is poorly studied in the efficacy of maintaining the closed cervical length. Retrospective data found no significant benefit on placing two stitches instead of one in preterm birth rate but was extremely limited and heterogenous in many clinical characteristic among the cerclage procedures. There were suggestions that two cerclage sutures may reduce the risk of cerclage revision, birth before 20 weeks, and a nonsignificant improvement in outcome of early preterm deliveries. Therefore, two randomized controlled trials one prospective study and one meta-analysis were performed. They did suggest a beneficial effect of double cerclage on obstetrical outcomes especially in earlier preterm birth rates although all were limited in sample size and therefore power. A randomized control trial with adequate sample size is still needed to answer the question of whether double cervical cerclage suture is more beneficial than a single suture.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 18 years of age and older
  • Confirmed intrauterine, live pregnancy
  • Singleton gestation
  • Cerclage indications including:
  • Prophylactic due to history of cervical insufficiency, second trimester loss
  • Ultrasound indicated short cervix <25 mm prior to 24 weeks

排除标准

  • Rescue cerclage
  • Carrying a fetus with known aneuploidy or anomaly
  • Fetal demise
  • Clinical intra-amniotic infection
  • Rupture of membranes
  • Multiple gestation
  • Placental Abruption
  • Technique other than McDonald
  • Abdominal cerclage

结局指标

主要结局

Preterm delivery <28 weeks gestation

时间窗: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Birth occurring less than 28 weeks and 0 days

次要结局

  • Preterm delivery <34 weeks gestation(through study completion, an average of 1 year)
  • Preterm delivery <37 weeks gestation(through study completion, an average of 1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Diana Garretto

MD Clinical Assistant Professor, Obstetric Quality Assurance Chair, Director Obstetric Ultrasound

Stony Brook University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验