Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00939445
NCT00939445CompletedPhase 3

Short Daily Hemodialysis and Online HDF: Which One is Better?

Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical College and Vajira Hospital1 site in 1 country10 target enrollmentStarted: June 1, 2009Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Enrollment
10
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Adequacy

Study Overview

Brief Summary

  1. To compare the efficacy of

  2. Short Daily Hemodialysis

  3. Online HDF in term of adequacy of dialysis.

Detailed Description

The investigators intend to compare the efficacy between these modalities of treatment in terms of adequacy and also other parameters such as calcium-phosphorus balance and hematocrit

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •stable ESRD
  • •KT/V > 1.2 for thrice weekly or > 1.8 for twice weekly

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Inadequate vascular access flow rate
  • •Concurrent medical illnesses
  • •History of non-compliance

Arms & Interventions

Online HDF

Active Comparator

Online HDF

Intervention: Online HDF (Procedure)

Short Daily Hemodialysis

Active Comparator

Short Daily Hemodialysis

Intervention: Short Daily Hemodialysis (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Adequacy

Time Frame: 3 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Hematocrit, calcium, phosphorus(3 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other Gov
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Thananda Trakarnvanich

Associate Professor

Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical College and Vajira Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials