MedPath

Photobiomodulation for Myofascial Pelvic Pain

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Pelvic Pain
Levator Ani Syndrome
Spastic Pelvic Floor Syndrome
Myalgia of Pelvic Floor
Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome
Interventions
Other: Pelvic floor physical therapy
Device: SoLá therapy
Registration Number
NCT05926752
Lead Sponsor
Orlando VA Medical Center
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of photobiomodulation of the pelvic floor muscles in female Veterans with chronic pelvic pain. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Is there a difference in reduction in overall pelvic pain between women who undergo photobiomodulation compared to women who received pelvic floor physical therapy?

* Is there a difference in compliance with therapy between the two groups? Participants will be randomized to treatment with either 9 treatments of photobiomodulation (two treatments per week) or 8 weeks of pelvic floor physical therapy (one treatment a week). Researchers will compare both groups to see if there is a difference in overall pelvic pain reduction.

Detailed Description

Background:

Myofascial pelvic pain (MFPP) is defined as pain in the pelvic floor muscles, the pelvic floor connective tissue, and the surrounding fascia. Standard treatment options of MFPP include pharmacotherapy and pelvic floor physical therapy (PT). In severe cases (approximately 25%) who are not responsive to therapy, pudendal blocks and trigger point injections (TPs) may be used to temporarily alleviate pain and improve function. However, these are more invasive and may require anesthesia. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) delivered by a low-level laser emitter has recently emerged as a treatment option for musculoskeletal disorders such as neck and low back pain. In patients with vaginal musculoskeletal pain, PBMT is also thought to be effective with minimal side-effects. SoLá is low-level pelvic laser emitter / photobiomodulation device that has FDA approval for intravaginal use to specifically treat myofascial pelvic pain and chronic pelvic pain. Although it is FDA approved and thought to be effective and less invasive, photobiomodulation using SoLá has not been rigorously studied in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Study Aims:

The primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of SoLá pelvic therapy by comparing reduction in overall pelvic pain between women who undergo 9 treatments of photobiomodulation with SoLá (approximately 1 treatment twice a week), compared to women who receive standard pelvic floor PT once a week for 8 weeks. The secondary aim is to compare dyspareunia, pain with sitting, and compliance with therapy between the two groups.

Study Design and Methods:

The investigators will conduct a RCT comparing overall pelvic pain (primary outcome), dyspareunia, and pain with sitting in women who receive PBMT with SoLá (group 1) vs. women who receive pelvic floor PT (group 2). Twenty-eight total participants will be randomized to either study group after providing informed consent. After enrollment, participants will be treated with 8 weekly treatments of pelvic PT or 9 treatments of SoLá (administered twice weekly). Patient outcomes will be evaluated at baseline (before treatment 1), midway through their treatment (before treatment 5 of SoLá and treatment 5 of PT), and at the end of their treatment (1-2 weeks after treatment 8 of PT/treatment 9 of SoLá and 3 months after treatment 8 of PT/treatment 9 of SoLá). Pain levels will be assessed using the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) which assesses sensory and affective components of pain, Pain Interference Short Form which evaluates the effect of pain on quality of life, and pain severity on a 1-10cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Anticipated Results:

The investigators hypothesize that women who undergo PBMT will demonstrate greater improvements in all pain outcomes when compared to pelvic floor PT.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
28
Inclusion Criteria
  • Clinically diagnosed MFPP
  • Age ≥ 18
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • English speaking
  • Agree not to participate in any other form of treatment of myofascial pelvic pain for 3 months after end of trial
Exclusion Criteria
  • Prior pelvic floor physical therapy or SoLá therapy for pelvic pain
  • Pregnancy documented by urine or blood
  • Taking drugs that have heat- or light- sensitive contraindications
  • Reporting decreased sensation in the vagina or rectum or if they are found to have abnormalities on the external neurosensory exam of the vagina
  • Have a known history of cancer of the cervix, vagina, uterus, bladder, or vulva or suspected to have neoplasia or pre-cancerous lesions
  • Have an active infection of the bladder, vagina, vulva, or urethra
  • Have active vaginal bleeding or blood in the vaginal canal
  • Have evidence of active vaginal trauma, ulcerations, erosions, or other evidence of vaginal and vulvar skin breakdown
  • Cannot tolerate vaginal examination either due to discomfort, pain or history or traumatic experience

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Pelvic Floor Physical therapyPelvic floor physical therapyThe participant will be treated with pelvic floor physical therapy once a week for 8 weeks. Physical therapy involves standard approach of manual therapy including trigger point release, soft tissue mobilization, stretching, biofeedback, breathing techniques, relaxation yoga, and therapeutic exercises.
PhotobiomodulationSoLá therapyThe participant will be treated with intravaginal SoLá photobiomodulation therapy for a total of nine treatments (two treatments a week). Each treatment lasting 5 minutes.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pelvic Pain Intensity3 months post treatment

Change pelvic pain intensity using a 0-10cm visual analog scale. High score means a worse outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Intensity of Dyspareunia3 months post treatment

Change in dyspareunia intensity using a 0-10cm visual analog scale. High score means a worse outcome.

Intensity of pain with sitting3 months post treatment

Change in intensity of pain with sitting using a 0-10cm visual analog scale. High score means a worse outcome.

Pain interference3 months post treatment

change in the score from the Pain Interference Short Form 8A PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Health Organizations questionnaire. High score is associated with worse outcome.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Orlando VA Medical Center

🇺🇸

Orlando, Florida, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath