Swiss Cohort of Health Professionals and Informal Caregivers - SCOHPICA
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Electronic surveys
- Conditions
- Healthcare Professional
- Sponsor
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisante), University of Lausanne, Switzerland
- Enrollment
- 6000
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [1]
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 3 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The healthcare system is continuously evolving to adapt to the population's needs, both in terms of healthcare practices, and in financial and organizational aspects. The current COVID-19 pandemic has added additional pressure to the healthcare system and shown its limits in terms of preparedness. It has also shown once again that both healthcare professionals (HCPs) and informal caregivers (ICs) play a central role for the functioning of the healthcare system.
An increasing number of studies are alerting on HCPs' situation, regarding their physical and mental health (e.g. emotional exhaustion, professional well-being) on the one hand, and the functioning of the healthcare system (e.g. absenteeism, turnover, career change) on the other hand.
Besides healthcare professionals, ICs, defined as "a person in the immediate entourage of an individual whose health and/or autonomy is impaired and who requires assistance with certain [basic or instrumental] activities of daily living. The IC provides the person, on a non-professional and informal basis, and on a regular basis, with assistance, care or presence services of varying nature and intensity, designed to compensate for their incapacities or difficulties or to ensure their safety, identity and social ties". Caring for others has shown to have negative impact on the ICs' life, in terms of health-related implications, psychological burden, quality of life, etc. Despite being increasingly recognized as having a key role in the provision of care, they have only been limitedly considered in studies on healthcare professionals.
In that context, the investigators develop SCOHPICA project, the Swiss cohort of healthcare professionals and informal caregivers, which is an open prospective national cohort using a concurrent embedded mixed method design. This project targets all types of HCPs and ICs, and will investigate determinants of intent to stay and well-being according to participants' trajectories.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Working as HCP, in any profession
- •Taking care of patients currently and actively
- •Working in any health work setting
- •Working as an independent or a salaried
- •Working in Switzerland
Exclusion Criteria
- •Being retired at baseline
- •Unable to read or speak in one of the national languages: German, French, Italian
- •Inclusion Criteria (ICs):
- •Being informal cargiver
- •Aged 18 and over (adults)
- •Exclusion Criteria (ICs):
- •Unable to read or speak in one of the national languages: German, French, Italian
Arms & Interventions
Healthcare professionals
All type of healthcare professionals (HCPs), working in a variety of settings and across Switzerland
Intervention: Electronic surveys
Healthcare professionals
All type of healthcare professionals (HCPs), working in a variety of settings and across Switzerland
Intervention: Qualitative Interviews
Informal caregivers
All type of informal caregivers (ICs), aged 18 and over, assisting a person for health reasons across Switzerland
Intervention: Electronic surveys
Informal caregivers
All type of informal caregivers (ICs), aged 18 and over, assisting a person for health reasons across Switzerland
Intervention: Qualitative Interviews
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [1]
Time Frame: At baseline
Professional trajectories will be formulated based on socio-professional information (current and past occupation, education, work setting, career continuity, part-time contracts). Clustering procedures will be used to group healthcare professionals with similar trajectories, building thus a typology of professional trajectories in the Swiss health workforce.
Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [2]
Time Frame: 1 year after the baseline
Follow-up data will be used to complement the professional trajectories constructed on baseline socio-professional information. Changes in the variables which form the trajectories will be assessed and new typologies will be derived from the enhanced trajectories.
Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [3]
Time Frame: 2 years after the baseline
Follow-up data will be used to complement the professional trajectories constructed on baseline socio-professional information. Changes in the variables which form the trajectories will be assessed and new typologies will be derived from the enhanced trajectories.
Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [4]
Time Frame: 3 years after the baseline
Follow-up data will be used to complement the professional trajectories constructed on baseline socio-professional information. Changes in the variables which form the trajectories will be assessed and new typologies will be derived from the enhanced trajectories.
Professional trajectories (HCPs), constructed from socio-professional variables [5]
Time Frame: 4 years after the baseline
Follow-up data will be used to complement the professional trajectories constructed on baseline socio-professional information. Changes in the variables which form the trajectories will be assessed and new typologies will be derived from the enhanced trajectories.
Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [1]
Time Frame: At baseline
Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position
Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [2]
Time Frame: 1 year after the baseline
Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position
Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [3]
Time Frame: 2 years after the baseline
Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position
Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [4]
Time Frame: 3 years after the baseline
Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position
Intention to stay in the profession/position (HCPs) [5]
Time Frame: 4 years after the baseline
Assessed using two questions: 1) intent to stay in the profession and 2) intent to stay in the current position
Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [1]
Time Frame: At baseline
Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector
Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [2]
Time Frame: 1 year after the baseline
Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector
Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [3]
Time Frame: 2 years after the baseline
Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector
Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [4]
Time Frame: 3 years after the baseline
Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector
Intention to leave the profession/position/health sector (HCPs) [5]
Time Frame: 4 years after the baseline
Assessed using three questions: within next 5 years …1) intent to leave the profession, 2) intent to leave the current position and 3) intent to leave the health sector
Well-being (HCPs) [1]
Time Frame: At baseline
Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.
Well-being (HCPs) [2]
Time Frame: 1 year after the baseline
Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.
Well-being (HCPs) [3]
Time Frame: 2 years after the baseline
Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.
Well-being (HCPs) [4]
Time Frame: 3 years after the baseline
Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.
Well-being (HCPs) [5]
Time Frame: 4 years after the baseline
Assessed using the10 items of the Flourish Index (FI). FI score can range from 0 (lowest response category for the 10 items) to 10 (highest response category for the 10 items). High scores imply that respondents perceive themselves very positively in terms of human flourishing.