Histologic Comparison of Ablative Techniques for Endometriosis
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Endometriosis; PeritoneumEndometriosis-related PainEndometriosisEndometriosis Pelvic
- Interventions
- Device: DiathermyDevice: CO2 LaserDevice: Argon Beam Coagulator
- Registration Number
- NCT06414083
- Lead Sponsor
- TriHealth Inc.
- Brief Summary
To our knowledge, no other human studies directly compare the effectiveness of the various ablative technologies. We set out to design a study to directly compare ablative energy sources and evaluate their ability to destroy native endometriosis tissue in humans.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 141
Inclusion Criteria
- Adult women 18 years of age or older
- Already planning to undergo scheduled robotic assisted or laparoscopic excision of lesions for pelvic pain symptoms (pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dysuria, dyschezia, ovarian pain) or endometriosis of any kind (endometriosis of any location, or endometrioma)
Exclusion Criteria
- Known pregnancy at enrollment or at the time of the excision surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Diathermy Diathermy - CO2 Laser CO2 Laser - Argon Beam Coagulator Argon Beam Coagulator -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Positive Histology 0 days Endometriosis seen on pathologic sample.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pelvic Pain 3 months Pre-operative and Post-operative Pelvic Pain Visual Analog Scale. Minimum Score 0. Maximum Score 100. Higher score is worse outcome.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Good Samaritan Hospital
🇺🇸Cincinnati, Ohio, United States