Confocal Endomicroscopy for Barrett's Esophagus
- Conditions
- Esophageal AdenocarcinomaBarrett's Esophagus
- Interventions
- Device: confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE)Device: standard endoscopy (EGD)
- Registration Number
- NCT00487695
- Lead Sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) can improve detection of Barrett's esophagus, dysplasia, and early esophageal cancer.
- Detailed Description
Barrett's esophagus is a leading cause of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Detection of dysplasia and early cancers in Barrett's esophagus can be challenging, time-consuming and expensive. Small lesions may be difficult to detect with standard endoscopy protocols. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a new type of endoscopy where a small confocal microscope is built into the tip of a standard endoscope. For this study, we are comparing confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) with targeted biopsies with standard endoscopy (EGD)and biopsy for Barrett's esophagus to determine if CLE is more effective for detecting dysplasia and cancer.
Participants with Barrett's esophagus in this study undergo 1) CLE with targeted mucosal biopsies (biopsy only taken if CLE shows abnormal tissue) and 2) standard EGD with biopsies. The order of procedures is randomized (some patients have CLE first while others have standard EGD first).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 46
- Barrett's esophagus or suspected Barrett's-associated neoplasia
- Age > 18
- Able to give informed consent
- Known advanced malignant disease
- Allergy to the fluorescent contrast agent fluorescein sodium
- Coagulopathy or bleeding disorder
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description CLE followed by standard EGD standard endoscopy (EGD) Participants are randomized to have either confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) or standard endoscopy (EGD) first. Then 6 weeks later, they have the other procedure. This arm is for patients randomized to CLE followed by standard EGD standard EGD followed by CLE confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) Patients are randomized to either have standard endoscopy (EGD)or confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) first. The second procedure is then completed 6 weeks later. This arm is for patients who had standard endoscopy first. standard EGD followed by CLE standard endoscopy (EGD) Patients are randomized to either have standard endoscopy (EGD)or confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) first. The second procedure is then completed 6 weeks later. This arm is for patients who had standard endoscopy first. CLE followed by standard EGD confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) Participants are randomized to have either confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) or standard endoscopy (EGD) first. Then 6 weeks later, they have the other procedure. This arm is for patients randomized to CLE followed by standard EGD
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Diagnostic Yield for Neoplasia in High Risk Patients(Suspected Neoplasia) 6 weeks The yield for neoplasia is calculated by the number of biopsies showing neoplasia over the total number of biopsies taken (normal + neoplastic biopsies)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean Number of Biopsies Taken in High Risk Patients (Suspected Neoplasia) 6 weeks The number of biopsies taken during each procedure (i.e. the number of biopsies taken during CLE, or the number of biopsies taken during standard EGD). Biopsies are taken during CLE only if CLE shows that the esophageal mucosa is abnormal. Esophageal biopsies are taken during standard EGD using a standard Barrett's esophagus protocol (4 quadrants, every 1-2 cm of the Barrett's esophagus). This analysis looks at the Barrett's patients with suspected (but not known) neoplasia.
Mean Number of Biopsies With Neoplasia in High Risk Patients (Suspected Neoplasia) 6 weeks The number of biopsies from each procedure (i.e. biopsies taken during CLE, or biopsies taken during standard EGD) that showed neoplasia. Neoplasia is high grade dysplasia or cancer. This analysis looks at patients with Barrett's suspected (but not known) neoplasia.
Diagnostic Yield for Neoplasia in Barrett's Surveillance Patients 6 weeks Our hypothesis was that the yield for neoplasia would be higher using confocal laser endomicroscopy compared to standard endoscopy. The null hypothesis would be that there is no difference in yield for neoplasia when CLE is used compared to standard endoscopy. This analysis looks specifically at patients who were referred for surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (no suspected neoplasia).
Mean Number of Biopsies With Neoplasia in Barrett's Surveillance Patients 6 weeks The number of biopsies from each procedure (i.e. biopsies taken during CLE, or biopsies taken during standard EGD) that showed neoplasia. Neoplasia is high grade dysplasia or cancer. This analysis looks at patients undergoing surveillance EGD for Barrett's esophagus (no suspected neoplasia).
Mean Number of Biopsies Taken in Barrett's Surveillance Patients 6 weeks The number of biopsies taken during each procedure (i.e. the number of biopsies taken during CLE, or the number of biopsies taken during standard EGD). Biopsies are taken during CLE only if CLE shows that the esophageal mucosa is abnormal. Esophageal biopsies are taken during standard EGD using a standard Barrett's esophagus protocol (4 quadrants, every 1-2 cm of the Barrett's esophagus). This analysis looks at the patients with Barrett's esophagus in the study who were undergoing surveillance EGD (no suspected neoplasia).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Johns Hopkins Hospital
🇺🇸Baltimore, Maryland, United States