跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02139085
NCT02139085Unknown2 期

A Prospective Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Of Electrocoagulation Versus Radiofrequency Treatment Of The Great Saphenous Vein In Patients With Varicose Veins.

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 82 人开始时间: 2014年8月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
2 期
入组人数
82
试验地点
2
主要终点
GSV occlusion

研究概览

简要总结

Introduction: Lower extremity Chronic Venous Insufficiency is a prevalent disease that adversely affects an individual's Quality of Life. Varicose vein endovenous radiofrequency treatment have a lower risk of iatrogenic injuries and offer faster return to work activities, when compared with open surgical techniques. Endovenous electrocoagulation can selectively and safely cause Great Saphenous Vein (GSV) wall necrosis but its clinical results has never been studied before.

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare Great Saphenous Vein electrocoagulation and radio frequency (RF) endovascular varicose vein treatment clinical results and quality of life improvement in a prospective double blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

Methods: Consecutive patients with varicose veins and primary GSV reflux will be randomized to Electrocoagulation or Radiofrequency endovenous treatment. The primary outcome measure will be GSV occlusion rate at 3 and 6 months after treatment verified by Duplex Scanning (DS). Secondary outcome measures will be pain visual analogue scale (VAS), bruising, neuropathy and vein thrombosis frequency in the immediate postoperative period (1 week); and Clinical Etiology Anatomy and Pathophysiology (CEAP) classification ,Venous Clinical Severity Scale (VCSS), and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ), obtained preoperatively, at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. For statistical analysis, we will use the Student's t test, the Mann-Whitney test and Pearson's correlation, considering positive statistical significance when level of p <0.05.

详细描述

All patients included in the study will be preoperatively examined to evaluate the severity of venous disease, using the CEAP classification, VCSS and AVVQ. They will undergo venous DS with the aim of investigating GSV insufficiency, its caliber and depth and presence of previous thrombophlebitis.

Patients will be randomized on the day of surgery with an electronic table of random numbers:

Group 1:Electrocoagulation treatment. Group 2: Radiofrequency treatment.

Patients and outcomes assessor will be blinded to the group of endovenous treatment.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Symptomatic varicose veins of the lower limbs and partial or total failure (venous reflux) of the GSV

排除标准

  • Previous varicose vein surgery with removal of the GSV
  • Pregnant women
  • Patients in use of anticoagulants
  • Known thrombophilia
  • Presence of saphenous vein tortuosity and/or depth less then 7 mm from the skin
  • GSV diameter < 5mm and > 12 mm
  • Previous deep vein thrombosis
  • Peripheral arterial disease.

结局指标

主要结局

GSV occlusion

时间窗: 6 months

GSV occlusion verified by blinded DS operator

次要结局

  • Pain VAS(1 week)
  • Post operative sensory abnormality(1 week)
  • Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT)(1 week)
  • Post operative bruising(1 week)
  • Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ)(6 months)
  • Clinical Etiology Anatomy Pathophysiology (CEAP)(6 months)
  • Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)(6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Fabio H Rossi

vascular surgeon PhD

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验