Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05272618
NCT05272618
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Clinical Relevance of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Assessments in Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries

Chonnam National University Hospital1 site in 1 country150 target enrollmentFebruary 14, 2022

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Myocardial Infarction
Sponsor
Chonnam National University Hospital
Enrollment
150
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
MACCE
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

To compare clinical outcomes of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) according to the coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT), invasive and non-invasive coronary physiologic assessment.

Detailed Description

Background Approximately 5\~10% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been reported as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) in the contemporary clinical setting. Although those with MINOCA have a better prognosis than with obstructive coronary artery disease, several observational studies continuously reported that patients with MINOCA showed comparable outcomes. One plausible explanation of this discrepancy is the heterogeneous and variable definition of MINOCA. Possible causes of MINOCA include plaque erosion and/or rupture, vasospasm, and CMD. Therefore, it is natural that heterogeneous pathophysiology of MINOCA causes diagnostic challenges and proper management. Recently, there have been efforts for establishing the diagnosis of MINOCA and standardizing the systematic management according to the cause of MINOCA. According to the AHA scientific statement, patients who suspected MINOCA have been recommended to perform multimodality approach, including intravascular imaging (i.e., OCT). Although non-invasive methods, such as N-13 ammonia positron emission tomography (PET), can be used for evaluating the CMD, invasive coronary physiologic assessment using pressure-temperature wire has been recommended. CMD has been known as a major cause of MINOCA, and it may be required specific treatment. Nevertheless, there has no data on the outcomes of MINOCA with or without CMD. Therefore, the aim of CMD-MINOCA sought to assess the MINOCA patients regarding the latest clinical pathway for diagnosis of CMD and evaluate their clinical outcomes at 2 years.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 14, 2022
End Date
December 31, 2028
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Young Joon Hong

Professor

Chonnam National University Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject with age ≥19 years and acute myocardial infarction
  • Rise and/or fall of cardiac troponin with one level \>99 percentile plus ischemic signs/symptoms
  • Subject with non-obstructive coronary arteries
  • \<50% diameter stenosis or
  • fractional flow reserve (FFR) \>0.80 ③ Subject without previous history of coronary artery disease
  • Subject who performed invasive coronary angiography within 24 hours after presentation ⑤ Subject who eligible for invasive and non-invasive coronary physiologic assessment

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subject with obstructive coronary arteries
  • Subject with alternate diagnosis including sepsis, pulmonary embolism, myocarditis, Takotsubo syndrome, spontaneous coronary dissection, and other cardiomyopathies.
  • Subject with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest ④ Subject who has non-cardiac co-morbid conditions with life expectancy \<1 year ⑤ Subject or lactating women ⑥ Subject unable to provide consent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

MACCE

Time Frame: 2-Year after enrollment

a composite of cardiac death, any MI, any revascularization, stroke, readmission due to heart failure

Secondary Outcomes

  • cardiac death(2-Year after enrollment)
  • re-admission due to heart failure(2-Year after enrollment)
  • all-cause death, any MI, or any revascularization(2-Year after enrollment)
  • Changes of left ventricular ejection fraction(2-Year after enrollment)
  • Rate of myocardial infarction(2-Year after enrollment)
  • Changes of Coronary flow reserve(6-Month after enrollment)
  • Rate of stroke(2-Year after enrollment)
  • Rate of repeat revascularization(2-Year after enrollment)
  • all-cause death(2-Year after enrollment)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials