MedPath

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Assessments in Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries

Recruiting
Conditions
Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Myocardial Infarction
Vasospasm, Coronary
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: Intravascular imaging (OCT), Invasive physiologic assessment (FFR, CFR, IMR), or Non-invasive physiologic assessment (N-13 ammonia PET)
Registration Number
NCT05272618
Lead Sponsor
Chonnam National University Hospital
Brief Summary

To compare clinical outcomes of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) according to the coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT), invasive and non-invasive coronary physiologic assessment.

Detailed Description

Background Approximately 5\~10% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been reported as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) in the contemporary clinical setting. Although those with MINOCA have a better prognosis than with obstructive coronary artery disease, several observational studies continuously reported that patients with MINOCA showed comparable outcomes. One plausible explanation of this discrepancy is the heterogeneous and variable definition of MINOCA. Possible causes of MINOCA include plaque erosion and/or rupture, vasospasm, and CMD. Therefore, it is natural that heterogeneous pathophysiology of MINOCA causes diagnostic challenges and proper management.

Recently, there have been efforts for establishing the diagnosis of MINOCA and standardizing the systematic management according to the cause of MINOCA. According to the AHA scientific statement, patients who suspected MINOCA have been recommended to perform multimodality approach, including intravascular imaging (i.e., OCT). Although non-invasive methods, such as N-13 ammonia positron emission tomography (PET), can be used for evaluating the CMD, invasive coronary physiologic assessment using pressure-temperature wire has been recommended. CMD has been known as a major cause of MINOCA, and it may be required specific treatment.

Nevertheless, there has no data on the outcomes of MINOCA with or without CMD. Therefore, the aim of CMD-MINOCA sought to assess the MINOCA patients regarding the latest clinical pathway for diagnosis of CMD and evaluate their clinical outcomes at 2 years.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
150
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subject with age ≥19 years and acute myocardial infarction

    • Rise and/or fall of cardiac troponin with one level >99 percentile plus ischemic signs/symptoms

      • Subject with non-obstructive coronary arteries
    • <50% diameter stenosis or

    • fractional flow reserve (FFR) >0.80 ③ Subject without previous history of coronary artery disease

      • Subject who performed invasive coronary angiography within 24 hours after presentation ⑤ Subject who eligible for invasive and non-invasive coronary physiologic assessment
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subject with obstructive coronary arteries

    • Subject with alternate diagnosis including sepsis, pulmonary embolism, myocarditis, Takotsubo syndrome, spontaneous coronary dissection, and other cardiomyopathies.

      • Subject with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest ④ Subject who has non-cardiac co-morbid conditions with life expectancy <1 year ⑤ Subject or lactating women ⑥ Subject unable to provide consent
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MINOCA with CMDIntravascular imaging (OCT), Invasive physiologic assessment (FFR, CFR, IMR), or Non-invasive physiologic assessment (N-13 ammonia PET)MINOCA patients with CMD proven by invasive or non-invasive method
MINOCA without CMDIntravascular imaging (OCT), Invasive physiologic assessment (FFR, CFR, IMR), or Non-invasive physiologic assessment (N-13 ammonia PET)MINOCA patients without CMD
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
MACCE2-Year after enrollment

a composite of cardiac death, any MI, any revascularization, stroke, readmission due to heart failure

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
cardiac death2-Year after enrollment

death from cardiac-cause

re-admission due to heart failure2-Year after enrollment

re-admission due to heart failure

all-cause death, any MI, or any revascularization2-Year after enrollment

a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization

Changes of left ventricular ejection fraction2-Year after enrollment

left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography

Rate of myocardial infarction2-Year after enrollment

any type of myocardial infarction

Changes of Coronary flow reserve6-Month after enrollment

Coronary flow reserve by PET

Rate of repeat revascularization2-Year after enrollment

ischemia-driven or all

Rate of stroke2-Year after enrollment

ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke by brain imaging

all-cause death2-Year after enrollment

death from any-cause

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Chonnam National University Hospital

🇰🇷

Gwangju, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath