Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03791671
NCT03791671
Completed
N/A

Individual Balance Training vs. Group Balance Training to Improve Walking Speed Post Stroke - a Randomized, Controled Pilot Study

RehaClinic AG1 site in 1 country7 target enrollmentMarch 4, 2019
ConditionsStroke

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Stroke
Sponsor
RehaClinic AG
Enrollment
7
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change of the walking speed at three weeks
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This pilot study is part of a master's thesis. In the rehabilitation of stroke patients should be compared whether individual balance training has a greater effect than group balance training. The result is determined based on the walking speed.

Detailed Description

The RehaClinic Kilchberg is a neurological rehabilitation facility with the phases B-D. Between February and the end of March, out of 78 patients, 71% of the patients had a stroke. Therefore, my choice of topic for the Master's thesis fell on balance training of patients after a stroke. The duration of the study is based on the timetable for the Master's thesis. Initially, 20 stroke patients will be recruited. When the number is reached, the study is completed to begin descriptive statistics and analyze potential BIAS. Deficits in the vestibular, visual, motor, and / or somatosensory systems lead to falls in the first 6 months after the stroke. This affects approximately 46% of patients. But also cognitive processes, such as attention and concentration. Therefore, the treatment must be adapted to the respective strategy of the patient. If the patient increasingly uses the visual system, the therapy has to work a lot with the eyes closed. In turn, if he uses more of the sensorimotor system is increasingly trained with unstable documents. After this system, the balance program was set up. It is the same for the intervention and control group to make a difference between individual and group training.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 4, 2019
End Date
May 31, 2019
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
RehaClinic AG
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mrs. Wiebke Weigert

Principal investigator

RehaClinic AG

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • stroke starting from Rehabilitation phase B
  • ability to understand therapy instructions
  • walkable with aids

Exclusion Criteria

  • Neurodegenerative disease
  • non-stroke dizziness
  • cardiopulmonary insufficiency
  • polyneuropathy
  • peripheral vascular disease

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change of the walking speed at three weeks

Time Frame: Measurement one day before and one day after the three weeks intervention time, Data analysis through study completion

10m walking test

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change of the balance score at three weeks(Measurement one day before and one day after the three weeks intervention time, Data analysis through study completion)
  • Change of the Walking ability (walking aid) at three weeks(Measurement one day before and one day after the three weeks intervention time, Data analysis through study completion)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials