A Smart Self-Management Support Programme (3S) to Improve Quality of Life in Lung Cancer Patients
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Interventions
- Behavioral: 3S interventionBehavioral: GH information
- Registration Number
- NCT06377124
- Lead Sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong
- Brief Summary
Lung cancers patients often experience multiple symptoms (e.g. fatigue, dyspnea, distress, depression, sleep disturbance). The current study attempts to explore the efficacy of the Smart Self-Management Support Programme (3S) in improving quality of life of patients using self-management support programme with mobile devices.
- Detailed Description
Lung cancer (LC) is the most and second most common cancer globally and locally respectively. LC patients often experience multiple symptoms (e.g. fatigue, dyspnea, distress, depression, sleep disturbance). The symptom burden is greater than other cancers and adversely affects quality of life. Care of LC patients has shifted from a purely disease-centered approach on survival-related outcomes to person-centered approach with emphasis on quality-of-life outcomes.
Self-management support programme (SMS) is perceived to supplement regular medical treatments and follow-up and cost-effective in cancer care. Besides, digital technologies have been used in patient empowerment digital platform to improve self-management of cancer patients. Using the self-management support programme and mobile devices, the Smart Self-Management Support Programme (3S) attempts to improve quality of life of patients.
The current study aims to examine the efficacy of 3S on improving quality of life and patient activation (knowledge, skills, and confidence for self-management) in the 3S intervention group, compared to the general health (GH) control group. It also aims to examine the changes in the burden of care, anxiety and depression symptoms, and quality of life of the family caregivers (FCGs) of the patients in the 3S group, compared to FCGs of the patients in the GH group.
We also conduct process valuations to assess the essential features of context, implementation, and impact mechanism, and cost-effectiveness evaluation to examine health care resource utilisation and cost-effectiveness analysis.
160 patients with lung cancer will be recruited, and 160 family caregivers will also be invited to join the study.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 320
- Aged 18 years or above
- Diagnosis of advanced-stage (stage III or stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer
- Ambulatory and capable of all self-care activities (ECOG ≤2)
- Either undergoing or has finished oncology therapy
- Mentally, cognitively and physically fit to join as determined by the doctor in charge and responsible clinical investigators
- Can speak and read Chinese
- Willing to complete the patient-reported outcome questionnaire
- Has a smartphone with WhatsApp or WeChat
- Preparing for lung operation
- Skeletal fragility
- Serious active infection
- Inability to walk
- Previously untreated symptomatic brain metastases
- Severe respiratory insufficiency
- Uncontrolled pain
- Diagnosed psychiatric illness with or without medication
Family Caregivers:
Inclusion criteria:
- Aged 18 years or above
- Family caregivers of recruited patients
Exclusion criteria:
- Unable to speak and read Chinese
- Unwilling to complete the patient-reported outcome questionnaire
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description The 3S intervention group 3S intervention Receive information and support on self-management of lung cancer The GH information group GH information Receive general health information such as sleep hygiene, environmental hygiene, etc.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in health-related quality of life Baseline and 8-week follow-up Measured by a 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Lung Module. All scale scores are linearly converted to a range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better functioning and quality of life.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in health-related quality of life Baseline and 24-week follow-up Measured by a 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Lung Module. All scale scores are linearly converted to a range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better functioning and quality of life.
Change in patient activation Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by a 13-item Patient Activation Measure with a 5-point Likert response scale from 0 to 4. Raw scores are transformed to a scale of 0-100 with higher scores indicating a higher activation in self-management.
Change in acceptance of illness Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up This is measured by a 12-item Peaceful Acceptance subscale of the Peace, Equanimity, and Acceptance in the Cancer Experience questionnaire. Each item ranges between 1 and 4. A higher score indicates a greater extent of acceptance of the cancer diagnosis.
Change in physical activity level Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured the days and duration of physical activity level (light, moderate and vigorous) and sitting time in the past 7 days by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (short version) with 4 questions.
Change in anxiety symptoms of patients Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by a 7-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment. Each item asks the individual to rate the severity of his or her symptoms with a 4-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. The higher scores the greater severity of anxiety symptoms.
Change in smoking and drinking habits Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by self-reported drinking and smoking frequency
Change in social and family support Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by 8-item Family and Friend Subscales of Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support with a 7-point Likert scale. Each scale ranges from 4 to 28. A higher score equates with higher social support.
Change in diet habit Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by 10-item dietary intake and practice outcome based questions
Change in general self-efficacy Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by a 10-item General Self-efficacy Scale with a 4-point Likert response scale from 1 to 4, the total score ranges between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy.
Change in health status Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by 5-item EuroQol-5D Questionnaire. Each item is a different dimension that ranges from level 1-5, a higher level indicates a more severe level of perceived problem of that dimension.
Change in symptom severity Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by 13-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer on symptom severity with a 4-point Likert scale. A higher score indicates a higher level of symptom severity.
Change in body composition Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Calculated by ratio of body weight and body height
Change in objective physical activity level Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by a 7-day waist-worn accelerometer
Change in burden of family caregivers (For FCGs) Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by the 24-item Caregiver Burden Inventory with a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. Total score ranges from 0 to 96 with higher score indicating a higher caregiver burden.
Change in depression symptoms of patients Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by a 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Each item asks the individual to rate the severity of his or her symptoms with a 4-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 27. The higher scores the greater severity of depression symptoms.
Change in adherence to agreed preset health-related goals Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by web-based platform (WhatsApp) in which patients will be asked to self-report whether they have completed their previously agreed health-related or general hygiene goals with nurses on a weekly basis. Adherence will be assessed by the frequency of self-reported goal completion by patients.
Change in lower limb strength Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by a 30-second chair stand test. The number of participant stood up repeatedly from a chair for 30 seconds.
Change in hand grip strength Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by a dynamometer
Change in functional exercise capacity Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by a 6-minute walk test. The distance of participant walked with the instructions to walk back and forth at their own pace to a designated spot for 6 minutes.
Change in balance Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by a single-leg stance test
Change in quality of life of family caregivers (For FCGs) Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by the 35-item Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer scale with a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. Total score ranges from 0 to 140. Higher score indicates a higher quality of life.
Change in flexibility Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by a Chair sit and reach test.
Change in anxiety symptoms of family caregivers (For FCGs) Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by a 7-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment. Each item asks the individual to rate the severity of his or her symptoms with a 4-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. The higher scores the greater severity of anxiety symptoms.
Change in objective sleep quality Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by a sleep-wake monitor (Motionlogger MicroWatch)
Change in depression symptoms of family caregivers (For FCGs) Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-up Measured by a 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Each item asks the individual to rate the severity of his or her symptoms with a 4-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 27. The higher scores the greater severity of depression symptoms.
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
🇭🇰Hong Kong, Ho ManTin, Hong Kong
United Christian Hospital
🇭🇰Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Queen Mary Hospital
🇭🇰Hong Kong, Hong Kong