A Meta-analysis Comparing Toothbrushes on Plaque Removal and Gingival Health
- Conditions
- GingivitisDental Plaque
- Interventions
- Device: Oscillating-rotating electric toothbrushDevice: Manual toothbrushDevice: Sonic electric toothbrush
- Registration Number
- NCT05594004
- Lead Sponsor
- Procter and Gamble
- Brief Summary
The aim of this analysis was to compare gingivitis- and plaque-reduction efficacy from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to six months long evaluating oscillating-rotating, sonic, and manual toothbrushes
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 2929
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Oscillating-Rotating electric toothbrush Oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush Twice daily brushing Manual toothbrush Manual toothbrush Twice daily brushing Sonic electric toothbrush Sonic electric toothbrush Twice daily brushing
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Dental Plaque Scores Up to 6 months (26 weeks) Change from baseline as measured by mean plaque score reduction from baseline (via Turesky's Modification of Quigley-Hein index, or Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index).
Number of Bleeding Sites Up to 6 months (26 weeks) Change from baseline as measured on number of bleeding sites ( via gingival bleeding index, Loe Silness index, Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), Papillary bleeding index or Mazza gingival index).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Multiple Study Locations
🇺🇸Cincinnati, Ohio, United States