IRCT20240130060854N1
Recruiting
未知
Efficacy of nasal high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure and double positive airway pressure in neonates less than 34 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences
- Enrollment
- 192
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Premature neonates less than 34 gestational age
- •Birth weight 1000 \- 2000 gr
- •Admitted in ahwaz emam khomeini hospital
- •In 6 first hours of life
Exclusion Criteria
- •Great anomaly
- •Airway anomaly
- •Cardiovascular instability
- •Sever asphyxia
- •Parents dissatisfaction
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Not Applicable
The efficacy of nasal high frequency ventilation in treatment of neonatal respiratory syndromeRespiratory distress syndrome.Respiratory distress syndrome of newbornIRCT2017062734782N1Isfahan University of Medical Sciences62
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Efficacy of Nasal High Flow therapy on the coordination between breathing and swallowing of saliva during daytime nap in COPD patients.COPDJPRN-jRCTs072200014Ayuse Takao15
Completed
Not Applicable
nHFOV Versus nCPAP in Transient Tachypnea of the NewbornTransient Tachypnea of the NewbornNCT03006354The Hospital for Sick Children60
Unknown
Not Applicable
Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Neonate After ExtubationRespiratory InsufficiencyNCT02543125Gao WeiWei75
Suspended
Not Applicable
NHFOV Versus NCPAP to Prevent Exubation FailureRespiratory Distress SyndromeNCT01852916University of Manitoba20