IRCT20240130060854N1招募中Unknown
Efficacy of nasal high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure and double positive airway pressure in neonates less than 34 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
试验速览
- 阶段
- Unknown
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 192
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 1 day 至 1 day（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Premature neonates less than 34 gestational age
- •Birth weight 1000 - 2000 gr
- •Admitted in ahwaz emam khomeini hospital
- •In 6 first hours of life
排除标准
- •Great anomaly
- •Airway anomaly
- •Cardiovascular instability
- •Sever asphyxia
- •Parents dissatisfaction
研究者
相似试验
招募中
不适用
The efficacy of nasal high frequency ventilation in treatment of neonatal respiratory syndromeRespiratory distress syndrome.Respiratory distress syndrome of newbornIRCT2017062734782N1Isfahan University of Medical Sciences62
招募中
不适用
Efficacy of Nasal High Flow therapy on the coordination between breathing and swallowing of saliva during daytime nap in COPD patients.COPDJPRN-jRCTs072200014Ayuse Takao15
已完成
不适用
nHFOV Versus nCPAP in Transient Tachypnea of the NewbornTransient Tachypnea of the NewbornNCT03006354The Hospital for Sick Children60
Unknown
不适用
Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Neonate After ExtubationRespiratory InsufficiencyNCT02543125Gao WeiWei75
暂停
不适用
NHFOV Versus NCPAP to Prevent Exubation FailureRespiratory Distress SyndromeNCT01852916University of Manitoba20