跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2019/09/021282
CTRI/2019/09/021282尚未招募1 期

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS) Protocols Versus Conventional Care Protocols Following Emergency Laparotomy: A Randomized Double Blinded Study

Jyoti Sharma0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
1 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • 1.Age >18 years with pre operatively diagnosed perforation peritonitis and acute intestinal obstruction planned for emergency laparotomies.
  • 2.ASA grade Ie to IIIe
  • 3.Hemodynamically stable
  • 4.Patients giving Informed consent for the study.

排除标准

  • 1.Pregnant patients.
  • 2.Patients on chronic steroids.
  • 3.Spontaneously sealed-off perforated ulcers that were diagnosed either preoperatively or during surgery and that did not require surgical repair.
  • 4.Malignant ulcers confirmed by histopathological examination if biopsied for a high index of suspicion for malignancy.
  • 5.Laparoscopic surgeries.
  • 6.Acute abdominal trauma surgeries.

研究者

发起方
Jyoti Sharma

相似试验

TO COMPARE THE CLINICAL OUTCOME OF FAST TRACK... | 临床试验