Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00513734
NCT00513734
Completed
Not Applicable

Randomised Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Ocular Lubricant (Lacrilube) and Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Dressing (Geliperm) for the Prevention of Exposure Keratopathy in the Critically Ill

Barts & The London NHS Trust0 sites40 target enrollmentSeptember 2004
ConditionsKeratitis

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Keratitis
Sponsor
Barts & The London NHS Trust
Enrollment
40
Primary Endpoint
Development of clinically significant corneal exposure
Status
Completed
Last Updated
18 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Corneal damage in critically ill patients is common. There are currently two popular methods of treatment in the UK; hydrogel dressings and lubricating ointment. We propose to randomise patients to have a different treatment for each eye and see which one is more effective.

Detailed Description

Microbial keratitis, particularly pseudomonas-related, has been widely reported amongst Intensive therapy unit (ITU) patients and the need for effective eye care in ITU has been recognised for some time. We compare two popular methods of eye care; a hydrogel dressing and lacrilube ointment. Each recruited patient had each eye randomised to different treatments. Daily ophthalmology ward rounds were undertaken to identify any corneal exposure keratopathy. Patients were removed from the trial if one eye developed significant exposure needing treatment.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2004
End Date
February 2005
Last Updated
18 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • All patients admitted to Intensive care and expected to stay for more than 2 days

Exclusion Criteria

  • Primary orbital injury

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Development of clinically significant corneal exposure

Time Frame: throughout length of admission to ITU

Similar Trials