MedPath

A Comparison of Hydrogel Dressings and Ocular Lubricants in the Prevention on Corneal Damage in the Critically Ill

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Keratitis
Interventions
Other: Hydrogel dressing
Other: Lacrilube ointment
Registration Number
NCT00513734
Lead Sponsor
Barts & The London NHS Trust
Brief Summary

Corneal damage in critically ill patients is common. There are currently two popular methods of treatment in the UK; hydrogel dressings and lubricating ointment. We propose to randomise patients to have a different treatment for each eye and see which one is more effective.

Detailed Description

Microbial keratitis, particularly pseudomonas-related, has been widely reported amongst Intensive therapy unit (ITU) patients and the need for effective eye care in ITU has been recognised for some time. We compare two popular methods of eye care; a hydrogel dressing and lacrilube ointment. Each recruited patient had each eye randomised to different treatments. Daily ophthalmology ward rounds were undertaken to identify any corneal exposure keratopathy. Patients were removed from the trial if one eye developed significant exposure needing treatment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • All patients admitted to Intensive care and expected to stay for more than 2 days
Exclusion Criteria
  • Primary orbital injury

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1Hydrogel dressingGeliperm Hydrogel Dressing
2Lacrilube ointmentLacrilube ointment
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Development of clinically significant corneal exposurethroughout length of admission to ITU
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath