Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06889558
NCT06889558Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Evaluation of the Bone Volume in Horizontal Atrophic Ridges Augmentation Using Tenting Grafting Technique Versus Khoury Technique in Mandibular Molar and Premolar Region: Randomized Clinical Trial

Cairo University0 sites20 target enrollmentStarted: April 1, 2025Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
20
Primary Endpoint
Horizontal bone gain and volume by CBCT

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the Tenting Grafting Technique and the Khoury Technique for horizontal augmentation of atrophic alveolar ridges in mandibular molar and premolar regions in dental implant procedures.

Hypothesis:

We hypothesis that the tenting grafting technique is more effective for augmenting atrophic ridges with horizontal bone deficiency, whereas the Khoury technique will yield superior results for severely atrophic ridges, where both vertical and horizontal bone augmentation is required.

Detailed Description

II. Introduction:

  1. Background and rationale:

Research question:

Would the tenting grafting technique result better in horizontal bone augmentation outcomes compared to the Khoury technique for atrophic ridges in dental implant procedures?

Statement of the problem:

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Age ≥ 18 years.
  • •Both sexes.
  • •Cooperative and likely to maintain good dental health.
  • •Adequate bone height for placement of implants with a minimum length of 10 mm.
  • •Totally or partially edentulous alveolar ridges.
  • •Placement Patients with insufficient bone for an implant.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Presence of any local or systemic factors that might contraindicate oral surgery.
  • •Poor oral hygiene. Conditions that complicate wound healing such as uncontrolled diabetes, smoking (10 cigarettes a day), pregnancy, a history of drug or alcohol abuse, and an inability or unwillingness to return for follow ups after occlusal loading
  • •Pathological lesions in the defect site.
  • •Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as alcoholism or para-functional habits.

Arms & Interventions

Khoury technique

Active Comparator

technique use for bone augmentation in atrophic ridges

Intervention: tenting titanium screw (Procedure)

tenting technique

Experimental

technique used for increase bone volume

Intervention: tenting titanium technique (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Horizontal bone gain and volume by CBCT

Time Frame: baseline

measurement of bone volume by CBCT in cubic centimeter ( cc3 )

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

ABDULRAHMAN RAJAB KHALLEEFAH

Evaluation of the bone volume in Horizontal Atrophic Ridges Augmentation Using Tenting Grafting Technique versus Khoury Technique in mandibular molar and premolar region: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Cairo University

Similar Trials