Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00697359
NCT00697359
Completed
N/A

An Observational Study to Assess the Efficacy of Continuous Subcutaneous Arrhythmia Monitoring Versus Conventional Ambulatory ECG-monitoring in Detecting Atrial Fibrillation in Patients After Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Odense University Hospital3 sites in 3 countries57 target enrollmentJune 2008

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Atrial Fibrillation
Sponsor
Odense University Hospital
Enrollment
57
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Number of patients with atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorder and number of patients with atrial fibrillation detected by conventional ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring
Status
Completed
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The primary aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of continuous rhythm monitoring with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) compared to conventional ambulatory electrocardiography in detecting episodes of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The secondary aim is to assess the efficacy of PVI during a two years follow-up and to assess the reliability of the implantable loop recorder in detecting atrial fibrillation.

50 patients will be enrolled into the study. After enrollment an implantable loop recorder will be implanted at least 6 weeks before scheduled PVI. All patients will be followed for 24 months after PVI. During the follow-up period a 72-hours ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring will be performed at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Transthoracic echocardiography will be performed at enrollment, 3, 12, and 24 months after PVI. Moreover, quality of life will be assessed at baseline, and 6 and 12 months after PVI.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 2008
End Date
June 2016
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Axel Brandes

Associate Professor

Odense University Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age =\> 30 to =\< 70 years
  • Documentation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
  • Documentation of persistent atrial fibrillation of \< 3 months duration termination either spontaneously or by DC cardioversion
  • Scheduled pulmonary vein isolation
  • Treatment with at least one class IC or class III antiarrhythmic drug tried

Exclusion Criteria

  • Atrial fibrillation episodes \> 3 months or permanent atrial fibrillation
  • No indication for pulmonary vein isolation
  • Contraindications for anticoagulation treatment
  • No informed consent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Number of patients with atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorder and number of patients with atrial fibrillation detected by conventional ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring

Time Frame: 12 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of asymptomatic and symptomatic atrial fibrillation episodes(12 months)
  • Number of symptomatic and asymptomatic atrial fibrillation episodes(12 months)

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials