MedPath

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Chondro-Gide® to Microfracture Alone for Treatment of Knee Cartilage Defects.

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Cartilage Injury
Osteochondritis Dissecans
Interventions
Procedure: Microfracture
Device: Chondro-Gide glued
Device: Chondro-Gide sutured
Registration Number
NCT02993510
Lead Sponsor
Geistlich Pharma AG
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of using Chondro-Gide® collagen membrane either sutured or glued compared to microfracture alone in the treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee.

Detailed Description

* Prospective, randomized, active treatment-controlled, open-label multicenter study (up to 40 sites in the US and EU).

* All subjects that meet preoperative screening eligibility criteria will be randomized to treatment with Chondro-Gide® either sutured or glued or Microfracture alone.

* Eligible and consenting subjects are randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio using centralized randomization list to receive one of the following treatments: Group I: Microfracture alone; Group II: Microfracture covered with a Chondro-Gide® membrane glued with fibrin glue (AMIC glued); Group III: Microfracture covered with a Chondro-Gide® membrane sutured (AMIC sutured)

* All subjects will be assessed at intervals post-procedure (6 weeks, 3 months, and 1,2 and 5 years).

* Subjects will be required to follow a strict pre-specified post-surgery rehabilitation protocol specific to the defect location.

* Measures to assess effectiveness and safety will be conducted at all follow-ups.

* Safety will be assessed by the collection of adverse events at all timepoints.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
67
Inclusion Criteria
  • Male or female between 18 and 50
  • One or two cartilage defects Grade III or IV according to Outerbridge classification
  • Defect size between 2 and 10 cm2 (inclusive)
  • Intact normal surrounding cartilage to suture the Chondro-Gide® membrane
  • Informed consent
  • Patient willing to fulfill a strict postoperative physiotherapy scheme
Exclusion Criteria
  • More than 2 defects
  • Defects on both knees
  • X-ray signs of osteoarthritis
  • Bone lesion > 0.7 cm in the defect
  • Knee instability, varus or valgus deformation, status after complete meniscus resection, status after mosaicplasty, patella dysplasia
  • Rheumatoid, infectious disease
  • Skin lesion on the operated knee
  • Treatment with cartilage building medication
  • Drug and alcohol abuse
  • Chronic heart disease, endocrine or metabolic disease, Haemophilia A/B
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Collagen allergy
  • Participation in other Trials

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
microfractureMicrofractureMicrofracture is an arthroscopic surgical technique involving placement of microfracture penetrations within the cartilage defect to provide stem cells and growth factors from the bone marrow to aid cartilage repair
Microfracture with Chondro-Gide gluedChondro-Gide gluedMicrofracture covered with a collagen membrane (Chondro-Gide®) using fibrin glue in a one-step mini-arthrotomy procedure
Microfracture with Chondro-Gide suturedChondro-Gide suturedMicrofracture covered with a collagen membrane (Chondro-Gide®) using atraumatic sutures in a one-step mini-arthrotomy procedure
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Histological evaluation of structural repair of evaluable biopsies harvested from the core of the index lesion during arthroscopy at 2 years2 years post-surgery

The macroscopically assessed integration, surface properties and extent of filling of the defect and the microscopically assessed using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score

MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) assessment of structural repair parameters.6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery

Structural repair is assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, 1.5T) by an independent and blinded radiologist, with a focus on the extent, signal intensity and surface of the defect filling, integration to adjacent cartilage, and bone marrow lesion (BML).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from Baseline in the patient's evaluation of overall knee condition using the Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System.6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery

The Change from Baseline will be evaluated.

Change from Baseline in the patient's evaluation of pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery

The Change from Baseline will be evaluated.

Change from Baseline in the patient's evaluation of overall knee condition using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) "Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package".6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery

The Change from Baseline will be evaluated.

Adverse Events (AE) Review5 years post-surgery

The incidence, timing, severity, and relationship to treatment of all Adverse Events (AE), will be collected for all participants.

Trial Locations

Locations (7)

Unfallklinik Hannover

🇩🇪

Hanover, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Freiburg

🇩🇪

Freiburg, Germany

Sportklinik Ravensburg

🇩🇪

Ravensburg, Germany

University of Regensburg

🇩🇪

Bad Abbach, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Giessen

🇩🇪

Giessen, Germany

University of Schleswig-Holstein

🇩🇪

Lubeck, Germany

Orthopedikum Hamburg

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath