Intubation on a Pediatric Manikin by Emergency Medical Staff: a Comparison of Direct Laryngoscopy, Airtraq and Glidescope in Normal, Tongue Edema and Face-to-face Intubation Models
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Difficult Intubation
- Sponsor
- Kocaeli University
- Enrollment
- 13
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- intubation time
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 9 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
After Local Human Research Ethics Committee approval, emergency medical staff enrolled in this study. After watching a video about the intubation using Airtraq, Glidescope or direct laryngoscopy, they attempted to intubate a pediatric manikin in three different airway models.
Detailed Description
After Local Human Research Ethics Committee approval, emergency medical staff enrolled in this study. After watching a video about the intubation using Airtraq , Glidescope or direct laryngoscopy, they attempted to intubate a pediatric manikin in three different airway models; normal airway, tongue edema and an entrapped model by face-to-face approach. Intubation attempts, insertion and intubation times, success rates, Cormack-Lehane grades and the need for maneuvers of these devices were recorded.
Investigators
Zehra Ipek ARSLAN
Assistant Professor
Kocaeli University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •pediatric
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
intubation time
Time Frame: 120 seconds
handling of the device till visualization of the tube entering through the vocal cords
Secondary Outcomes
- intubation attempts (is it increased or not)(intraoperative)
- need of maneuvers (mender applied or not)(intraoperative)
- insertion time(30 seconds)
- esophageal intubation (eosophageal intubation occured or not)(intraoperative)
- cormack-lehane grade (which one improves the cormack- lehane grade)(intraoperative)