Intubation on a Paediatric Manikin by Emergency Staff: a Comparison of Airtraq and Glidescope
- Conditions
- Difficult Intubation
- Registration Number
- NCT02478203
- Lead Sponsor
- Kocaeli University
- Brief Summary
After Local Human Research Ethics Committee approval, emergency medical staff enrolled in this study. After watching a video about the intubation using Airtraq, Glidescope or direct laryngoscopy, they attempted to intubate a pediatric manikin in three different airway models.
- Detailed Description
After Local Human Research Ethics Committee approval, emergency medical staff enrolled in this study. After watching a video about the intubation using Airtraq , Glidescope or direct laryngoscopy, they attempted to intubate a pediatric manikin in three different airway models; normal airway, tongue edema and an entrapped model by face-to-face approach. Intubation attempts, insertion and intubation times, success rates, Cormack-Lehane grades and the need for maneuvers of these devices were recorded.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 13
- pediatric
- adult
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method intubation time 120 seconds handling of the device till visualization of the tube entering through the vocal cords
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method intubation attempts (is it increased or not) intraoperative the patient intubated at which attempt?
need of maneuvers (mender applied or not) intraoperative maneuver applied or not
insertion time 30 seconds handling of the device till the glottic visualization
esophageal intubation (eosophageal intubation occured or not) intraoperative eosophageal intubation occured or not
cormack-lehane grade (which one improves the cormack- lehane grade) intraoperative
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Kocaeli University School of Medicine
🇹🇷Kocaeli, Turkey
Kocaeli University School of Medicine🇹🇷Kocaeli, Turkey