MedPath

Flexible Tip Bougie Catheter Intubation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Emergency Medicine
Endotracheal Intubation
Cardiopulmonary Arrest
Registration Number
NCT03733158
Lead Sponsor
Lazarski University
Brief Summary

We, therefore conducted a randomized cross over study to evaluate the usefulness of this new device use by experienced anesthesiologists in several airway manikin scenarios. We hypothesized that in the hands of experienced anesthesiologists the new Flexible Tip Bougie catheter would perform comparably to the standard bougie catheter) in the normal airway scenario. In the difficult airway (both tongue edema, manual in-line stabilization, or cervical collar stabilization), we hypothesized that the new Flexible Tip Bougie catheter would prove superior to the standard Bougie stylet.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
32
Inclusion Criteria
  • physicians
  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • none experience in videolaryngoscopy
  • less than 1 year experience in medicine
Exclusion Criteria
  • not meet the above criteria
  • wrist or low back diseases

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
time to intubation1 day

time from pick up device to the final placement tube in trachea

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Ease of use1 day

self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization. A 100% score is a extremely difficult procedure. A Ease of use score of 1% means that procedure is extremely easy

Number of optimalization maneuvers1 day

the number of optimization maneuvers required (re-adjustment of head position, second assistant) to aid endotracheal intubation.

success of intubation1 day

A failed intubation attempt was defined as an attempt in which the trachea was not intubated, or which required more than 120 seconds to perform

Dental compression1 day

An independent observer scored the severity of dental compressions, which was calculated based on the number of audible teeth clicks (0; 1; ≥2) with the Laerdal airway trainer, and based on a grading of pressure of the teeth (none = 0; mild = 1; moderate/serve ≥2) on the Simman®3G simulator. At the end of each scenario, each participant scored the ease of use of each intubation method on a visual analogue scale (VAS; from 0=Extremely Easy to 100=Extremely Difficult).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Lazarski University

🇵🇱

Warsaw, Masovia, Poland

Lazarski University
🇵🇱Warsaw, Masovia, Poland

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.