Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05676320
NCT05676320Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

A Multicentre, Single-blind, RCT to Document the Safety and Efficacy of the Use of a Bone Cement With or Without Inossia® Cement Softener for Patients With Vertebral Compression Fractures

Inossia AB9 sites in 4 countries203 target enrollmentStarted: March 11, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
203
Locations
9
Primary Endpoint
New fractures

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The overall purpose of conducting this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of V-Flex and V-Steady for augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and to verify that adding a cement softener into a PMMA bone cement is comparable to a PMMA bone cement alone (V-Steady).

Detailed Description

The clinical investigation is a prospective, single-blind, controlled multi-center study of vertebral compression fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty with PMMA alone (V-Steady) or PMMA mixed with Inossia® Cement Softener (V-Flex).

The overall purpose of conducting this study is to confirm the safety and efficacy of Inossia® Cement Softener mixed with PMMA for augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and to verify that the V-Flex is, at least, comparable (non-inferior) to the PMMA products used today.

All eligible patients will be invited to participate in the study. A total of 203 patients were enrolled in the study.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Informed consent obtained before any study-related activities (study-related activities are any procedures that would not have been performed during normal management of the patient, i.e. standard of care);
  • Symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture without prior or not responding to medical treatment within 6 months;
  • Maximum of 1 level of vertebral compression fractures eligible for treatment localized at level Th5 to L5 and verified by MRI or bone scan;
  • Height reduction of the affected vertebra(e) with an anterior wall compression of not exceeding 60% compared to the nearest normal vertebral body determined by X-ray;
  • Have pain correlating to the fractured levels requiring regular analgesic intake and/or causing substantial disability of daily life;
  • Pain score ≥ 40 mm measured by VAS correlating to at least one of the fracture levels (scale 0 - 100 mm) at the screening visit;
  • Oswestry Disability Index > 20 (0 - 100 scale);
  • SF-12PCS Index < 80 (0 - 100 scale);
  • Patient with a communicative ability to understand the procedure and participate in the study and comply with the follow up program.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients below 18 years;
  • Any burst fracture;
  • Unstable fractures defined by neurological deficit or interspinous process widening as evaluated by the Investigator, as well as kyphosis > 30°, translation > 4 mm;
  • Established or suspected malignancy of the fractured vertebra. Hemangioma of the fractured vertebra;
  • High energy trauma or clinical diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus or severe spinal stenosis as suggested by progressive weakness;
  • Have neurologic symptoms or deficits, or radiculopathy related to the fractured vertebrae;
  • Patients with extremely high BMI, i.e. BMI ≥ 40;
  • Previously treated with vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty;
  • Patients with concomitant diseases which may be worsened by invasive treatment of the fracture such as e.g. severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction (including aortic aneurysm), as judged by the Investigator
  • Irreversible coagulopathy or bleeding disorder. Note regarding reversible coagulopathies: Patients on Coumadin or other anticoagulants may participate. Investigators should follow routine practices for perioperative discontinuation and re- initiation of anticoagulants;
  • Active systemic infection or local skin infection at the puncture site;
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding;
  • Patients with known chemical dependency or drugs or with a medical history of drug abuse;
  • Patients who are serving prison sentence;
  • Have participated in another investigational study within 30 days prior to inclusion
  • Pacemaker
  • Previous or active radiotherapy affecting the spine

Arms & Interventions

V-Flex

Experimental

Bone cement including Inossia® Cement Softener

Intervention: V-Flex (Device)

V-Steady

Active Comparator

Bone Cement alone

Intervention: V-Steady (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

New fractures

Time Frame: 1 year

To assess the effectiveness after administration of V-Flex compared to V-Steady as measured by reduction of new radiologically confirmed fractures.

Timing of fractures

Time Frame: 1 year

Assess the timing of adjacent, non-adjacent and re-fractures of the treated vertebra after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA.

Location of fractures

Time Frame: 1 year

Assess the location of new fractures: adjacent or non-adjacent to the treated vertebral or re-fractures of the treated vertebra after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Function by ODI(24 months)
  • Pain measured by VAS(24 months)
  • Health related quality of life by SF-12(24 months)
  • Safety measured by adverse events(24 months)
  • Analgesic use(24 months)
  • Hospital Beds(1 week)
  • The vertebral height(24 month)
  • Osteoporotic treatment regimen checklist(24 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Inossia AB
Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (9)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Investigating Bone Cement With or Without... | Clinical Trial