跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04607967
NCT04607967招募中不适用

Efficacy of High Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy Started in the Emergency Room Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Distress

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon13 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 500 人开始时间: 2020年11月23日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
500
试验地点
13
主要终点
Therapeutic escalation

研究概览

简要总结

A quarter of the patients admitted to the Shock Room or Resuscitation Room of an Emergency Department (ED) are admitted for severe hypoxemia resulting from acute respiratory distress. Like all life-threatening conditions, acute respiratory distress (ARD) requires a rapid identification and a prompt implementation of effective resuscitation measures.

Oxygen treatment, first described in 1890, remains one of the most important discoveries in medicine. The purpose of oxygenation is to alleviate respiratory failure and to restore a satisfactory hematosis. The choice of the oxygen delivery device is based on the severity of the hypoxemia, the underlying physiological problems, the type of dyspnea and the patient's tolerance to the device. The most commonly used devices are nasal cannula, face mask and high-concentration face mask (conventional oxygen therapy). High Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO) is now widely used as a complement to conventional oxygen therapy in the EDs.

HFNO ensures good clinical tolerance and better patient comfort (humidification and heating of inhaled gases...) than the other oxygen devices. The HFNO flow rate can go up to 60-70 L/min with an FIO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen inspired oxygen fraction) of 100% compared to a maximum output of 15 L/min with conventional oxygen-therapy.

Given the lack of data and clinical trials concerning the systematic use of HFNO in EDs in cases of severe hypoxemia, a prospective study is essential. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the contribution of early administration of HFNO for patients with acute non-hypercapnic respiratory distress presenting in the ED, with the aim of obtaining rapid correction of hematosis. The objective of this work is to compare Conventional Oxygen Therapy (CO) delivered by nasal cannula or nasal-oral mask at flow rates up to a maximum of 15 liters, to HFNO with the hypothesis that HFNO would reduce the need for ventilation therapy escalation. The other hypotheses concern the interest of the HFNO in reducing the use of intensive care hospitalization and thus the costs of treating these patients.

详细描述

Acute Respiratory Distress (ARD) is defined as the inability of a patient to maintain normal hematosis. A hematosis disorder is defined as an alteration of the blood gases with hypoxemia (partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) less than 80 mm of mercury (mmHg) and transcutaneous O2 saturation (SpO2) less than 95%), associated or not with hypercapnia (partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) > 45 mmHg) or hypocapnia depending on the cause of the acute respiratory failure. Compensation mechanisms include increased minute ventilation, increased ventilatory work and increased cardiac output. When these compensatory mechanisms are insufficient, acute respiratory distress occurs, along with signs of heart failure (acute cor pulmonale) and neuropsychic disorders.

Without care, a potentially fatal respiratory decompensation may occur. ARD can be hypercapnic. It's defined as a PaCO2 greater than 45 mm Hg associated with a drop in blood pH reflecting respiratory acidosis. Hypoxemic ARD is defined as a PaO2 of less than 60 mm Hg.

A quarter of the patients admitted to the Vital Emergency Room are admitted for severe hypoxemia resulting from acute respiratory distress.

Like all life-threatening conditions, acute respiratory distress (ARD) requires a rapid identification and a prompt implementation of effective resuscitation measures.

Oxygen treatment, first described in 1890, remains one of the most important discoveries in medicine. The purpose of oxygenation is to alleviate respiratory failure and to restore a satisfactory hematosis. Most experts stress the importance of having an SpO2 target of more than 90% in the majority of patients. While non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the standard of care in the initial management of patients with hypercapnic acidosis, there are currently no recommendations for oxygen therapy in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory distress in the emergency department.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients over 18 years of age
  • Admitted to the Emergency Department for acute respiratory distress :
  • Respiratory rate ≥ at 25 cycles/min.
  • And SpO2 ≤ at 95% without or with oxygen whatever the mode.
  • And clinical signs of respiratory distress (pulling, thoraco-abdominal swinging).
  • And PaO2/FIO2 ratio < 300mmHg.

排除标准

  • Hypercapnic patients (PaCO2 > 45mmHg) with respiratory acidosis (pH<7.30).
  • Indication for non-invasive ventilation or early invasive mechanical ventilation according to current scientific recommendations (acute pulmonary edema, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease decompensation, or others).
  • Dyspnea of traumatic origin.
  • Traumatic pneumothorax.
  • Hemodynamic instability (PAM<65mmHg).
  • Patients treated with Mobile Emergency and Resuscitation Service (SMUR) who have already received cardiac or pulmonary treatment.
  • Patients with cognitive deterioration (Glasgow score less than 13, dementia or mental failure that would prevent good cooperation).
  • Patients with lesion(s) of the oro-nasal sphere contraindicated for the implementation of High Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy.
  • Subject unlikely to cooperate in the study and/or low cooperation anticipated by the investigator.
  • Subject without health insurance.
  • Pregnant woman.
  • Subject being in the exclusion period of another study or included in the "national volunteer file".

结局指标

主要结局

Therapeutic escalation

时间窗: 4 hours after treatment initiation

The need for a therapeutic escalation will be searched 4 hours after treatment initiation (either Conventional Oxygen or High Flow Nasal Oxygen)

次要结局

  • Assessment of the effectiveness of HNFO on patient outcomes (Total time of HNFO use in the ED, ED length of stay, length and type of hospitalization, and patient's status at 30-day (deceased, still hospitalized or discharged from the hospital).)(30 days after treatment initiation)
  • Etiology of dyspnea(30 days after treatment initiation)
  • Identification of possible early prognostic factors for HFNO failure, defined as the need for a therapeutic escalation, within 60 minutes after its initiation.(60 minutes after treatment initiation)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (13)

Loading locations...

相似试验

HFNO or Conventional Oxygen Therapy for Patients... | 临床试验