Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube on Feeding Hesitancy in Stroke Patients
- Conditions
- Dysphagia
- Registration Number
- NCT06312371
- Lead Sponsor
- Muhammad
- Brief Summary
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare Feeding Hesitancy of ischemic stroke patients who receive enteral nutrition support through either Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube or Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an observation group or a control group, with both groups receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. The observation group will receive enteral nutrition support through Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube, while the control group will receive it through Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will then compare Feeding Hesitancy of the two groups.
- Detailed Description
The study will last 15 days for each participant. The aim of this clinical trial is to compare Feeding Hesitancy of ischemic stroke patients who receive enteral nutrition support through either Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube or Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an observation group or a control group, with both groups receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. The observation group will receive enteral nutrition support through Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube, while the control group will receive it through Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will then compare Feeding Hesitancy of the two groups.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 80
- age ≥ 18 years;
- meeting the diagnostic criteria of stroke;
- any degree of dysphagia at admission;
- steady vital signs.
- complicated with other neurological diseases;
- tracheostomy tube plugged;
- unfeasible to the support of parenteral nutrition;
- simultaneously suffering from liver, kidney failure, tumors, or hematological diseases.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire day 1 and day 15 Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life, which consists of 44 items and divided into 11 main domains, including: overall satisfaction, understanding, diet, hydration, communication, respiratory issues, postoperative recovery, social impact, mental health, saliva control, and appearance. The maximum rough score was 220 points, which was converted into a standard percentage system in our study. As the scores increased, the quality of life was better.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method